TCL 40 SE vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 190 g 186 g
Height 167.9 mm 160.5 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 50.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali G615-MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SEXiaomi Poco X6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3Poco X6 Pro is slightly smaller and more compact.
Weight (g)190186Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco X6 Pro offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Display Size (inches)6.756.67Virtually the same screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001220 x 2712Poco X6 Pro has a much sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Poco X6 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)450 (typ)1800 (peak)Poco X6 Pro is far more readable in direct sunlight.
HDRNoHDR10+, Dolby VisionPoco X6 Pro supports HDR content for a superior viewing experience with compatible videos.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G37 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)Poco X6 Pro offers significantly faster processing speed and better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)Poco X6 Pro has a more powerful and modern CPU architecture, resulting in much better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali G615-MC6Poco X6 Pro provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming and other visually intensive applications.
RAM4GB/6GB8GB/12GBPoco X6 Pro offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and better performance with memory-intensive apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Poco X6 Pro has a higher resolution main sensor. Image quality differences will depend on sensor quality and processing, which cannot be fully determined from these specs.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EISPoco X6 Pro can record higher resolution videos with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50105000Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging18W67WPoco X6 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for a smoother and more responsive experience.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, faster refresh rate, and HDR support result in a dramatically improved visual experience.
  • Faster Charging: Charges much faster with 67W fast charging.
  • Better Camera Capabilities: Higher resolution main camera, 4K video recording, and optical image stabilization.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Poco X6 Pro's superior features come at a significantly higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality like calling, texting, and web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks or gaming.
  • Use Cases: Casual social media, light web browsing, making calls, and sending texts.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. Also suitable for photography enthusiasts.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, high-quality media consumption, photography, and videography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is significant.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? (e.g., gaming, photography, social media)
  3. How important is display quality and performance to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: TCL 40 SE
  • Balanced Budget, Moderate Usage: Consider other mid-range options, as the TCL 40 SE is very basic and the Poco X6 Pro might be overkill.
  • Performance and Features Focused: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The performance difference alone would make a huge impact on daily usage, especially for multitasking and demanding applications. The AMOLED display with a high refresh rate and HDR support is a significant upgrade over the TCL 40 SE's LCD. The faster charging is a major convenience in today's fast-paced world. While the TCL 40 SE serves its purpose as a budget device, the Poco X6 Pro's advancements justify the higher price for users who value performance, display quality, and modern features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.