TCL 40 SE vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 190 g 202 g
Height 167.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SEvivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5vivo X100 is slightly smaller and potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)190202TCL 40 SE is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO AMOLEDvivo X100 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO technology.
Display Size (inches)6.756.78Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001260 x 2800vivo X100 has significantly higher resolution, resulting in much sharper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120vivo X100 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)450 (typ), 900 (peak)3000vivo X100 is drastically brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G37 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)vivo X100 boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)vivo X100's CPU architecture offers substantial performance gains.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Immortalis-G720 MC12vivo X100 offers a vastly superior GPU, delivering a significantly enhanced gaming and graphics performance.
RAM4/6 GB12/16 GBvivo X100 offers much more RAM, allowing for seamless multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera50 MP50 MP (Sony IMX920)vivo X100 utilizes a higher-quality sensor (IMX920) likely resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range.
UltrawideNot specified50 MPvivo X100 offers an ultrawide lens, expanding creative photography options.
TelephotoNot specified64 MP with OISvivo X100 features a telephoto lens with optical image stabilization, enabling zoomed shots with reduced blur.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsNot specified but likely higher based on chipsetvivo X100 likely supports higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities due to its powerful chipset.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50105000Similar battery capacities.
Fast Charging18W120Wvivo X100 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • Higher Quality Display: Sharper, brighter, and more vibrant AMOLED display with a faster refresh rate.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher quality sensors, ultrawide and telephoto lenses, and likely better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging time.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking.

vivo X100: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and advanced camera capabilities. Ideal for mobile gamers, content creators, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The TCL 40 SE is a budget option, while the vivo X100 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Display quality, camera capabilities, performance, battery life, charging speed.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: TCL 40 SE
  • Demanding User, Premium Features: vivo X100

My Choice: vivo X100

While the TCL 40 SE offers excellent value for its price, the vivo X100's superior performance, stunning display, and advanced camera system make it the clear winner for me. The significantly faster charging is a huge bonus. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to capture great photos and videos. The price difference is significant, but the vivo X100 offers a substantial upgrade in almost every aspect, making it a worthwhile investment for my needs. The 120W fast charging alone drastically changes daily usage by eliminating charging anxiety.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.