TCL 40 SE vs vivo V29 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl
vivo V29
vivo V29
Vivo

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 September 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 91.62 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 190 g 186 g
Height 167.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • Space Black
  • Himalayan Blue
  • Purple Fairy
  • Majestic Red

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 100.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 50.21 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SEvivo V29Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5The vivo V29 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)190186Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDvivo V29 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.756.78Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution720 x 16001260 x 2800The vivo V29 has a significantly sharper display (453 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120vivo V29 provides smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)450 (typ), 900 (peak)1300vivo V29 will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G37Snapdragon 778G 5Gvivo V29 offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)The vivo V29 utilizes more powerful CPU cores, resulting in a noticeable performance gap.
RAM4/6 GB8/12 GBvivo V29 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother app switching.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPMegapixel count is similar, but image quality will likely differ due to sensor and processing differences (not detailed in specs).
Selfie Camera8MP50MPvivo V29 boasts a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsvivo V29 can record videos at a much higher resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50104600TCL 40 SE has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Fast Charging18W80Wvivo V29 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer usage time between charges.
  • Lower price point.

vivo V29 Advantages:

  • Significantly superior display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness lead to a much better viewing experience.
  • Much faster performance: A more powerful chipset and more RAM enable smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
  • Faster charging: 80W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to 18W.
  • Better camera capabilities (likely): Higher resolution selfie camera and 4K video recording capability suggest a superior camera system, though detailed sensor information is lacking for a definitive conclusion.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and improved network performance in areas with 5G coverage.

Trade-offs:

  • The TCL 40 SE sacrifices performance, display quality, and charging speed for a lower price and larger battery.
  • The vivo V29 has a slightly smaller battery capacity but offers a vastly improved user experience in almost all other aspects.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality over performance and premium features. Best for:

  • Casual users primarily focused on calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Users in areas with limited or no 5G coverage.

vivo V29: Users who value a premium experience with a great display, fast performance, and fast charging. Best for:

  • Mobile gamers
  • Power users who multitask heavily
  • Content consumers who enjoy watching videos and browsing social media
  • Users who prioritize camera quality

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The TCL 40 SE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Casual users might find the TCL 40 SE sufficient, while power users will prefer the vivo V29.
  3. Which features do you prioritize most? (e.g., display quality, performance, battery life, camera)

My Choice: vivo V29

While the TCL 40 SE offers a larger battery and a lower price, the vivo V29 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, and fast charging capabilities outweigh the slightly smaller battery capacity for me. The difference in display quality and performance alone would make the vivo V29 a much more enjoyable phone to use daily. The price difference is substantial, but the value proposition of the vivo V29 is stronger for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience and a vibrant display, making the vivo V29 the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.