TCL 40 SE vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 190 g 185 g
Height 167.9 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SERealme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Realme C65 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed usability.
Weight (g)190185Negligible weight difference; both phones are relatively lightweight.
Display
Size (inches)6.756.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1604Virtually identical resolution; both are HD+ displays. Expect similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display technology; expect comparable color accuracy and viewing angles.
Peak Brightness (nits)450 (typ), 900 claimed peak500 (typ), 625 (HBM)The TCL 40 SE has a higher claimed peak brightness, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. However, typical brightness is lower than Realme C65.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G37Mediatek Helio G85The Helio G85 in the Realme C65 is more powerful, leading to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C65's CPU architecture with Cortex-A75 cores offers a significant performance advantage over the TCL 40 SE.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Realme C65's GPU is significantly more capable for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM4GB6GB/8GBRealme C65 offers more RAM, improving multitasking and app loading times, especially the 8GB variant.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both have 50MP main sensors, but image quality will depend on sensor size and processing which is not fully detailed.
Other Cameras2MP Depth, 2MP Macro2MP DepthSimilar secondary camera setups; macro cameras on both are likely of limited use.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities. Realme C65 claims 120fps slow motion which would be a practical advantage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50105000Nearly identical battery capacities; expect comparable battery life.
Fast Charging18W45WRealme C65 offers significantly faster charging, reducing downtime considerably.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Helio G85 chipset and higher RAM capacity offer a noticeable advantage in speed and multitasking.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the TCL's 18W.
  • Slightly More Compact: Offers marginally improved one-handed use.

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Potentially Brighter Display: Claimed peak brightness is higher, potentially improving outdoor visibility. However, typical brightness is lower.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in a lower price range, offering potentially better value for budget-conscious users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE: Ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks or gaming.

Realme C65: Suitable for users who need a more responsive phone for multitasking, gaming, and media consumption. The faster charging is a significant benefit for users on the go.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The TCL 40 SE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? For basic tasks, the TCL 40 SE might suffice. For demanding tasks or gaming, the Realme C65 is necessary.
  3. How important is fast charging? Realme C65's 45W fast charging is a major advantage if you need quick top-ups.

My Choice: Realme C65

While the TCL 40 SE offers a lower price, the Realme C65's superior performance, significantly faster charging, and more modern OS make it a better overall choice. The performance difference between the Helio G37 and G85 is substantial and will impact daily usability. The faster charging is a huge convenience in today's fast-paced world. Even though the price is higher, the Realme C65 offers better long-term value due to its more capable hardware. The slightly smaller form factor is also appreciated. While TCL boasts higher peak brightness, real-world typical brightness favors the Realme and is a more practical metric. Lastly, a more recent launch date (and therefore newer Android version) suggests longer software support and updates for the Realme C65.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.