TCL 40 SE vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 190 g 179 g
Height 167.9 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.5 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.49 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SEMotorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Moto G55 is slightly smaller and more compact, potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)190179Moto G55 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.756.49TCL 40 SE offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001080 x 2400Moto G55 has significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Moto G55 provides smoother scrolling and animations with its higher refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction but potentially lacking deep blacks compared to OLED.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G37 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)Moto G55 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to better performance and battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G55 utilizes more powerful Cortex-A78 cores, resulting in significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320IMG BXM-8-256Moto G55 has a more capable GPU, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)48Moto G55 offers double the RAM, allowing for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution.
Additional Cameras2MP Depth, 2MP Macro8MP Wide AngleMoto G55 offers a more versatile camera setup with a wider field of view. TCL 40 SE includes a dedicated macro lens, but its usefulness is limited by the low resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G55 can record at 60fps, resulting in smoother video footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50105000Nearly identical battery capacities.
Fast Charging18W30WMoto G55 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 7025 chipset, more powerful CPU & GPU, and larger RAM provide a much smoother and faster user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density result in clearer and more detailed visuals.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeable improvement in scrolling and animations.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • More Versatile Camera: Wider angle lens enables capturing broader scenes.

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers more screen real estate for media consumption.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: Negligible difference in real-world usage.

Trade-offs:

  • TCL 40 SE: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and charging speed for a larger display and lower price.
  • Moto G55: Higher price for significantly improved performance, display, and camera versatility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large screen for media consumption and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for casual web browsing, social media, and light gaming.

Moto G55: Users who value a smooth and responsive experience, play demanding games, or require a versatile camera. Ideal for multitasking, photography enthusiasts, and mobile gamers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G55 is positioned in a higher price bracket.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Casual use vs. demanding tasks/gaming.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Display size vs. resolution/refresh rate, performance, camera versatility, charging speed.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Use: TCL 40 SE
  • Balanced Budget, Versatile Use: Moto G55
  • Gamer/Power User: Moto G55

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the TCL 40 SE offers a larger display at a lower price, the Moto G55's superior performance, smoother and sharper display, faster charging, and more versatile camera make it the clear winner for me. The difference in chipset, RAM, and refresh rate would result in a significantly better day-to-day user experience. I prioritize a smooth and responsive phone over a slightly larger screen, and the performance improvements offered by the Moto G55 are substantial enough to justify the higher price. The faster charging and more versatile camera system are additional benefits that solidify my choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.