Sony Xperia 5 IV vs Nokia C32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date September 22, 2022 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 85.71 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 172 g 199.4 g
Height 156 mm 164.6 mm
Width 67 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Ecru White
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.1 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 449 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 134.37 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 58.34 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Sony Xperia 5 IV and the Nokia C32. On paper, they might both look like smartphones, but they cater to very different needs and expectations. Let's break it down.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSony Xperia 5 IVNokia C32Real-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2022-09-222023-02-25Nokia C32 is newer by roughly 5 months, meaning potentially newer software features out of the box.
Form FactorStandardStandardBoth are standard, non-folding phones.
Dimensions156 x 67 x 8.2 mm164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mmThe Sony is smaller, narrower, and thinner, making it more pocketable and easier to handle.
Weight172g199.4gSony's lighter weight provides better long-term comfort during use.
Display
Size6.1"6.5"Nokia C32 has a slightly larger screen for content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 2520720 x 1600Sony's higher resolution means sharper text and images.
Pixel Density449 PPI270 PPISony's display will appear much crisper and more detailed.
TechnologyOLEDIPS LCDSony's OLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzSony's 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsNeither spec provided, we cannot compare their brightness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Unisoc SC9863A1Sony's chipset is a high-performance powerhouse, while the Nokia's is a budget-level processor.
AnTuTu Score1,021,542109,200Sony offers drastically better performance for demanding tasks like gaming, multi-tasking and video editing.
GPUAdreno 730IMG8322Sony's GPU offers superior graphics for a better visual experience with gaming and video playback
Camera
Main Camera12MP (f/1.7)50MPNokia's main sensor captures more detail at higher resolutions but may not always translate into better image quality.
Selfie Camera12MP (f/2.0)8MP (f/2.2)Sony has a sharper selfie camera with a wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Telephoto Lens12MP (f/2.4)NoneSony's telephoto lens allows for optical zoom without quality loss.
Wide Angle Lens12MP (f/2.2)NoneSony has a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing landscape.
Macro LensNone2MP (f/2.4)Nokia has a macro lens for extreme close up shots.
Video4K@120fps with HDR, OIS, EIS1080p@30fpsSony offers high-quality, stabilized video recording with advanced features.
DxOMark ScoreMobile 119N/ASony has a camera that's been independently tested and scored well, while the Nokia has not been tested
Camera Features4K Video, OIS, EIS, RAW, Triple Camera, ZoomDual Camera, Front Flash, AutofocusSony has many more advanced photo and video features, while the Nokia has basic features.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have the same battery capacity for potentially similar usage times, however the Nokia uses a lower performance processor which should increase battery life
Charging30W Fast10W FastSony's phone charges significantly faster.
FeaturesBypass Charging, Reverse chargingNoneSony offers more battery management features
Software
OSAndroid 12Android 13Nokia ships with a newer version of Android out of the box.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWiFi 6802.11nSony has significantly newer wifi standards for faster connection speeds and lower latency.
Bluetooth5.2 LE4.2 LESony offers faster connection speeds, and better audio quality with Bluetooth 5.2.
GPSDual-Band GPSBasic GPSSony has additional GPS bands for better location accuracy and reliability.
SIMNano SIM + eSIMDual Nano SIMSony offers a flexible eSIM option, while Nokia has two physical slots for SIM cards.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB/256GB64GB/128GBSony has more internal storage options.
RAM8GB3GB/4GBSony's additional RAM enables smoother multi-tasking and higher performance with demanding apps.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither device supports microSD cards.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, Stereo SpeakersBasic FeaturesSony offers a premium audio experience, while Nokia offers standard audio output.
Security
Biometric Unlockside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones have a basic fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass VictusUnknownSony has a premium screen protection, while Nokia has an unknown level of protection.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, HallProximity, AccelerometerSony has many more advanced sensors for motion sensing and environmental measuring.

2. Key Insights

Sony Xperia 5 IV:

  • Strengths: The Sony Xperia 5 IV is a performance powerhouse with a fantastic display, a versatile camera system, and premium audio features. Its compact design belies its high-end specs. The combination of a 120Hz OLED, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, and excellent cameras make it a flagship experience in a small body.
  • Competitive Advantages: It stands out with a 120Hz OLED display, powerful chipset, advanced camera features including a telephoto lens, and high-resolution video capabilities. Its premium build, advanced audio, and extra sensors makes it suitable for power users.
  • Trade-offs: It's not as new as the Nokia, and it doesn't have expandable storage. The price will be considerably higher than the Nokia.

Nokia C32:

  • Strengths: The Nokia C32 is a budget-friendly phone with a large screen and long-lasting battery. It has a simple, functional design, and a decent 50MP main camera for the price point.
  • Competitive Advantages: It runs on a newer version of Android and comes with the essential features needed for basic smartphone use. It offers great battery life due to its less demanding processing power, and is a highly affordable entry-level device.
  • Trade-offs: It suffers from weak performance, a low resolution screen, inferior camera quality, and significantly slower charging. The lack of features and low performance makes it unsuitable for power users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Sony Xperia 5 IV is best for:

  • Tech Enthusiasts: Users who appreciate high performance, advanced features, and a premium build.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Those who want a high-quality screen for watching videos and gaming with enhanced audio.
  • Photography Buffs: Users who want a versatile camera system with optical zoom, high-resolution video, and advanced features such as RAW photography.
  • On-the-Go Professionals: Users who need a compact device with high processing power, and advanced connectivity.
  • Gamers: Users who want a smooth, high-resolution display, with a high-performance GPU.

Nokia C32 is best for:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those seeking an affordable smartphone for basic everyday use.
  • First-Time Smartphone Owners: Users who are new to smartphones and don’t require high-end features.
  • Casual Users: Those who use their phone mostly for calling, texting, and social media, and prefer a long-lasting battery life.
  • Users Needing a Secondary Phone: People seeking a backup device without high-end capabilities, but want to run the latest Android OS.
  • Elderly Users: A device with the basic functionality that is simple to operate and has an affordable price tag.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help users decide:

  1. Performance: Do you need a phone that handles demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, or is basic functionality enough?
  2. Screen Quality: Is a high-resolution, vibrant display with a smooth refresh rate essential for your experience, or is a basic screen adequate?
  3. Camera Capabilities: Do you require advanced camera features such as optical zoom and high-resolution video, or do you primarily use your camera for simple snapshots?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: The Power User. You need a device for gaming, heavy app usage, video editing, and professional photography. Recommendation: Sony Xperia 5 IV. The high-performance chipset, superior display, versatile camera system and added sensors make it the ideal choice.
  • Scenario 2: The Casual User. You mostly use your phone for calling, texting, social media, and occasional web browsing. Recommendation: Nokia C32. The basic functionality, low price tag, and newer version of android make it the correct choice.
  • Scenario 3: The Budget-Conscious Photographer. You want to take good pictures and videos, but cost is a major factor. Recommendation: Sony Xperia 5 IV. While the Sony is more expensive, it has a better camera system by a large margin, and better video recording features.
  • Scenario 4: The Secondary Phone Seeker. You want a secondary phone with long battery life and latest android experience. Recommendation: Nokia C32. The Nokia C32 has low processing power which increases battery life and ships with android 13, which is a newer experience than the Sony.

Conclusion

The Sony Xperia 5 IV and Nokia C32 are distinctly different phones catering to vastly different needs. The Sony excels in every area as a high-performance device with a focus on visual and audio experience, while the Nokia is a budget-friendly phone with basic functionality. The final decision depends entirely on individual requirements and budget constraints.

My Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would go with the Sony Xperia 5 IV without hesitation. As a tech journalist and smartphone analyst, I value performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. The Xperia 5 IV's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, OLED display, and versatile camera system make it a clear winner for me. I enjoy gaming, creating content, and consuming high-quality media, all of which the Xperia 5 IV excels at. While the price tag is higher, the technology and user experience justify the investment for my needs. I appreciate the engineering and the user experience of the Xperia devices.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.