Sony Xperia 5 III vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 8, 2021 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 87.54 cm³ 97.64 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.37 "/g
Weight 168 g 199 g
Height 157 mm 160.9 mm
Width 68 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Pink
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.1 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 1290 x 2796
Aspect Ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.4 % 88 %
Pixel Density 449 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.94 mAh/in² 104.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.4 mAh/cm³ 47.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4674 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Adreno 660 Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Video Output USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 11 18
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Sony Xperia 5 III vs. Apple iPhone 16 Plus: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's explore the Sony Xperia 5 III and the Apple iPhone 16 Plus through the lens of user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSony Xperia 5 IIIApple iPhone 16 PlusUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)iOS 18Android offers customization; iOS emphasizes simplicity. User preference dictates impact.
Interaction FlowPhysical buttons, side fingerprintFace ID, gesture-based navigationXperia offers tactile feedback; iPhone focuses on seamless transitions. Different approaches to efficiency and control.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibilityComprehensive iOS accessibilityBoth offer accessibility features, but iOS generally provides a wider range and deeper integration.
Design ErgonomicsCompact, lightweight (168g)Larger, heavier (199g)Xperia suits one-handed use; iPhone offers a larger screen but might be less comfortable for extended periods.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Day in the Life:

Imagine a freelance photographer using the Xperia 5 III. Its compact size allows for easy maneuverability while capturing street scenes. The dedicated camera button provides a familiar tactile experience, reminiscent of traditional cameras, allowing for quick shots. The 120Hz display ensures smooth subject tracking.

Now, picture a content creator using the iPhone 16 Plus. The larger Super Retina XDR display provides a vibrant canvas for video editing. The powerful A18 chip ensures smooth performance when working with demanding applications. Cinematic mode adds a professional touch to videos.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Group: Senior Citizens:

The Xperia's physical buttons might be easier for users with dexterity challenges. However, the iPhone's larger text and icons, coupled with comprehensive accessibility features, could be more beneficial for those with visual impairments.

User Group: Creative Professionals:

The Xperia's dedicated camera button and professional video features appeal to photographers and videographers. The iPhone's powerful processor and larger display cater to graphic designers and video editors. Both cater to creative needs in distinct ways.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices hinges on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Compactness and Tactile Feedback? Xperia 5 III.
  • Prioritize Large Screen and Seamless Performance? iPhone 16 Plus.

My Choice: The Apple iPhone 16 Plus

While I appreciate the Xperia 5 III's compact design and unique features like the dedicated camera button, I would choose the iPhone 16 Plus. The deciding factors are the larger, more vibrant display crucial for consuming multimedia and the powerful A18 chip which ensures a smooth user experience even with demanding tasks. The robust iOS ecosystem and its focus on seamless integration across devices also contribute to my decision. Although heavier, the iPhone 16 Plus's superior screen real estate and performance align better with my needs for both productivity and entertainment. The advancements in camera technology, particularly the improvements in low-light performance and video capabilities, also make it a compelling choice for capturing everyday moments and creative projects. While the Xperia 5 III offers a compelling alternative for users prioritizing a compact form factor and specific professional features, the iPhone 16 Plus offers a more well-rounded and future-proof experience for my personal preferences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.