Sony Xperia 10 III vs Samsung Galaxy A22 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 July 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 86.92 cm³ 98.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 169 g 186 g
Height 154 mm 159.3 mm
Width 68 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Pink
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 457 PPI 274 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 600 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 125.00 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.77 mAh/cm³ 50.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Sony Xperia 10 III vs. Samsung Galaxy A22: A Detailed Comparison

These two mid-range phones offer different strengths—one excels in display and camera versatility, while the other prioritizes battery life and smoother visuals. Let’s break down which one suits your needs.


1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIISamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Dimensions154 × 68 × 8.3 mm159.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mmXperia is more compact and lighter (169g)—better for one-handed use. A22 is bigger and heavier (186g)—better for media but less pocket-friendly.
Build ProtectionGorilla Glass 6Unknown screen protectionXperia has better durability against scratches/drops.

Display

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIISamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Size6.0" OLED6.4" AMOLEDA22 has larger screen, better for videos. Xperia has sharper text & images.
Resolution1080 × 2520 (457 PPI)720 × 1600 (274 PPI)Xperia's higher PPI makes it much crisper—great for reading & detail work.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA22 offers smoother scrolling & animations, better for gaming.

💡 Verdict:

  • Xperia 10 III → Best for sharpness & color accuracy.
  • Galaxy A22 → Better for motion smoothness & larger viewing.

Performance

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIISamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
ChipsetSnapdragon 690 (8nm)Helio G80 (12nm)A22's Helio G80 is slightly faster (38% higher benchmark score)—better for gaming & multitasking.
RAM & Storage6GB RAM, 128GB storageUnknown (likely 4GB/64GB)Xperia has more RAM & storage, better for power users.
GPUAdreno 619LMali-G52 MC2Adreno GPU is better optimized for games than Mali.

💡 Verdict:

  • A22 → Slightly faster in benchmarks, but Xperia has more RAM & better storage, making it more future-proof.

Camera

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIISamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Main Camera12MP (f/1.8) + 8MP telephoto + 8MP ultrawide48MP (f/1.8) + 5MP ultrawide + 5MP depthA22 has higher resolution, but Xperia has better zoom & ultrawide quality.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsXperia wins for higher-quality video.
Selfie Camera8MP (f/2.0)8MP (f/2.0)Similar performance.
Night ModeNoYesA22 takes better low-light shots.

💡 Verdict:

  • Xperia 10 III → Better for zoom, video, and detail.
  • Galaxy A22 → Better for low-light shots and depth effects.

Battery & Charging

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIISamsung Galaxy A22Real-World Implications
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhA22 lasts longer—better for heavy users.
Charging Speed18W15WXperia charges slightly faster.

💡 Verdict:

  • A22Longer battery life.
  • XperiaFaster charging.

2. Key Insights

Sony Xperia 10 III Wins At:

Sharper display (457 PPI vs. 274 PPI)
Better build quality (Gorilla Glass 6)
Superior camera versatility (telephoto, 4K video)
More RAM & storage (6GB/128GB vs. likely 4GB/64GB)

Samsung Galaxy A22 Wins At:

Smoother display (90Hz vs. 60Hz)
Bigger battery (5000mAh vs. 4500mAh)
Better low-light photos (Night Mode)
Higher benchmark performance


3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Choose the Sony Xperia 10 III if:

  • You value display sharpness & camera flexibility (telephoto, 4K video).
  • You prefer a lighter, more compact phone.
  • You multitask heavily (more RAM & storage).

Choose the Samsung Galaxy A22 if:

  • You prioritize battery life & smoother scrolling.
  • You take lots of low-light photos.
  • You prefer a larger display for media.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do I care more about display sharpness or smoothness?

    • Sharpness → Xperia
    • Smoothness → A22
  2. Do I take zoomed-in shots and 4K videos?

    • Yes → Xperia
    • No → A22 (better low-light & depth effects)
  3. Do I need longer battery life or faster charging?

    • Longer battery → A22
    • Faster top-ups → Xperia

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

I’d pick the Sony Xperia 10 III.

Why?

  • Better display sharpness (457 PPI) makes text and images look far crisper.
  • More RAM & storage means better longevity.
  • Superior camera versatility (telephoto + 4K video) is more useful than A22’s higher-res main sensor.

The Galaxy A22 is great for battery life and smooth scrolling, but the Xperia offers a more premium experience in key areas like display, build, and camera flexibility.

If you can compromise on battery, the Xperia is the smarter buy. If battery life is critical, the A22 is a strong alternative.

What matters more to you? Let me know in the comments! 🚀

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.