Sony Xperia 10 III vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date June 11, 2021 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 86.92 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 169 g 200 g
Height 154 mm 169.2 mm
Width 68 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Pink
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6 " 6.75 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 457 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 125.00 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.77 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Sony Xperia 10 III vs. Nokia C31: A User-Focused Comparison

When choosing between these two smartphones, you're looking at two very different philosophies: Sony's refined mid-range multimedia powerhouse versus Nokia's budget-friendly endurance device. Let's break down how they compare in real-world usage.


1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build Quality

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
Dimensions154 × 68 × 8.3 mm169.2 × 78 × 8.6 mmXperia is more compact and easier to handle, while the C31 is larger and bulkier.
Weight169g200gSony is 31g lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass 6Unknown (likely basic)Xperia has better scratch and drop resistance.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedRear-mountedSony's placement is more natural and ergonomic.

Display

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
Size6" OLED6.75" IPS LCDNokia offers a bigger screen, but Sony’s OLED has deeper blacks and better contrast.
Resolution1080x2520 (457 PPI)720x1600 (260 PPI)Sony’s screen is sharper and more detailed, great for media.
Brightness/ColorOLED (vibrant colors)IPS LCD (basic colors)Sony offers better outdoor visibility and richer colors.

Performance

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
ChipsetSnapdragon 690 5G (8nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28nm)Sony has far better performance—good for gaming and multitasking.
RAM6GB4GBSony can handle more apps open at once without slowdowns.
Storage128GB (non-expandable)64GB/128GB (non-expandable)Both offer decent storage, but Sony’s base model is double Nokia’s minimum.
Benchmark (AnTuTu)275,000109,200Sony is 2.5x faster—better for demanding apps and games.

Camera

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
Main Cameras12MP (f/1.8) + 8MP (tele) + 8MP (ultrawide)13MP (main) + 2MP (depth) + 2MP (macro)Sony has a more versatile setup, including telephoto and ultrawide—better for creative shots.
Selfie Camera8MP (f/2.0)5MP (f/2.2)Sony’s front cam is sharper and better in low light.
Video Recording4K @ 30fps1080p @ 30fpsSony supports higher-quality video, good for content creators.
Camera Features4K, digital stabilizationBasic stabilizationSony offers better stabilization for smoother videos.

Battery & Charging

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
Battery Capacity4500mAh5050mAhNokia has longer battery life, but Sony charges 80% faster (18W vs. 10W).
Fast Charging18W10WSony tops up quicker—better for users on the go.

Software & Connectivity

FeatureSony Xperia 10 IIINokia C31Real-World Implications
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable)Android 12Nokia has a newer OS, but Sony may get updates longer.
WiFiWi-Fi 6, dual-bandWi-Fi 4, single-bandSony has faster and more reliable WiFi.
Bluetooth5.1 (better for audio)4.2 (basic connectivity)Sony supports high-res audio codecs (LDAC, aptX).
GPSMore satellite supportStandard GPSSony has better location accuracy outdoors.

2. Key Insights

Sony Xperia 10 III Strengths

Best Display – OLED with 1080p resolution and sharp details.
Strong Performance – Snapdragon 690 outperforms Nokia’s Unisoc chip in speed and efficiency.
Better Camera System – More versatile lenses, 4K video, and better stabilization.
Premium Build & Features – Gorilla Glass 6, side-mounted fingerprint sensor, and superior audio.

Nokia C31 Strengths

Bigger Battery – 5050mAh means longer endurance on a single charge.
Larger Screen – 6.75” is great for media but lacks Sony’s sharpness.
Lower Cost – Likely cheaper, making it a budget option.

Trade-Offs

  • Sony charges faster but has smaller battery capacity.
  • Nokia has a big screen but lower resolution—text and video look less sharp.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Who Should Buy the Sony Xperia 10 III?

Media & Gaming Enthusiasts – OLED screen & strong chipset.
Photography Lovers – Better lenses, 4K video.
Tech-Savvy Users – Faster WiFi, better Bluetooth, premium feel.

Who Should Buy the Nokia C31?

Long Battery Life Seekers – 5050mAh lasts longer.
Budget Buyers – If price is the main factor.
Big Screen Fans – 6.75” is great for videos (at 720p).


4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask Yourself:

  1. Do I care more about screen quality or battery life?
    • Sony for display, Nokia for endurance.
  2. Will I use the camera often?
    • Sony if taking photos/videos matters.
  3. Do I need fast performance or just basic tasks?
    • Sony for speed, Nokia for calls/messaging.

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Best for Multimedia & Gaming → Sony Xperia 10 III
  • Best Budget Phone with Huge Battery → Nokia C31

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

I’d go with the Sony Xperia 10 III.

Why?

  • The OLED display is a huge upgrade over Nokia’s 720p LCD.
  • The Snapdragon 690 ensures smooth performance for years.
  • Camera versatility (telephoto + ultrawide) is more useful than Nokia’s extra 2MP sensors.
  • Faster charging makes up for the slightly smaller battery.

The Nokia C31 is great for battery life but is too slow and low-res for my use. The Sony simply offers better value per dollar in terms of performance, display, and camera quality—even if it’s a bit older.

Final Thought:

If you can live with slightly less battery life, the Xperia 10 III is the superior phone in almost every way. But if budget and battery are non-negotiable, the Nokia C31 is a decent basic option.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.