Sony Xperia 1 VI vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 3, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.3 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.39 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 192 g 189 g
Height 162 mm 171.4 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Platinum silver
  • Khaki green
  • Scar red
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.5 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.86 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 750 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

Sony Xperia 1 VI vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Comparative Analysis

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSony Xperia 1 VIMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions162 x 74 x 8.2 mm171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (Unfolded)Razr 50 Ultra is significantly taller when unfolded but thinner and more pocketable when folded. Xperia 1 VI offers a more traditional form factor.
Weight192g189gNegligible weight difference in practical usage.
FoldableNoYesRazr's foldable design offers portability and a unique form factor, while the Xperia 1 VI provides a larger, uninterrupted screen experience.
Display
Size6.5"6.9"Razr offers a larger main screen when unfolded.
TypeLTPO OLED, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr's higher refresh rate (165Hz) may provide smoother animations and scrolling compared to Xperia's 120Hz. Foldable display introduces a crease.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2640Razr's slightly taller aspect ratio and higher resolution result in a marginally sharper display.
Peak BrightnessNot specified3000 nitsRazr's significantly higher peak brightness ensures superior outdoor visibility. Lack of data for Xperia prevents a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Xperia 1 VI's newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 should offer significantly improved performance and efficiency over the Razr's 8+ Gen 1.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.3 GHz)Octa-core (up to 3.0 GHz)Xperia's CPU boasts higher clock speeds, potentially leading to faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 735Xperia 1 VI's Adreno 750 should deliver better gaming and graphics performance compared to the Razr's Adreno 735.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Storage512GB256GBXperia 1 VI provides double the internal storage.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@120fps (HDR, OIS, EIS)Up to 4K@60fps (HDR, EIS)Xperia offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities, as well as optical image stabilization (OIS) for smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh3800 mAhXperia 1 VI has a significantly larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset provides a significant performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Larger Battery: The 5000 mAh battery should offer considerably longer battery life.
  • More Storage: Double the internal storage (512GB) compared to the Razr 50 Ultra.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Higher resolution and frame rates, along with OIS, result in better video quality.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique form factor, increased portability, and a larger cover screen for quick interactions.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: The 165Hz display delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Brighter Display: Significantly brighter display for excellent outdoor visibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Sony Xperia 1 VI: Ideal for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and a traditional smartphone experience. Suitable for power users, mobile gamers, and content creators.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Best suited for users who value portability and a unique, foldable design. The larger cover screen enhances quick interactions without unfolding. Ideal for users who prioritize style and compactness.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor Priority: Do you prefer a traditional smartphone or a foldable device with added portability?
  2. Performance Needs: Is top-tier performance for gaming and demanding tasks crucial, or is a good balance of performance and efficiency sufficient?
  3. Battery Life Importance: Is all-day battery life a primary concern, or are you comfortable with more frequent charging?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Power User/Gamer: Choose the Sony Xperia 1 VI for its superior performance and battery life.
  • Style-Conscious/On-the-Go: Opt for the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra for its unique foldable design and portability.
  • Budget-Conscious (Assuming similar price): The Xperia 1 VI offers better value with its superior performance, battery, and storage, despite lacking the foldable form factor.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.