Sony Xperia 1 VI vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Detailed Comparison
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Sony Xperia 1 VI | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 162 x 74 x 8.2 mm | 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm (unfolded) | Razr 50 is taller unfolded, but significantly more compact when folded. Xperia 1 VI is thinner. |
| Weight | 192g | 188.4g | Negligible weight difference. |
| Foldable | No | Yes | Razr 50's foldable design offers portability but introduces potential durability concerns. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.9" | Razr 50 offers a larger screen for media consumption. |
| Type | LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Both offer excellent color accuracy and power efficiency. Razr 50's folding screen is unique but may have crease visibility. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2640 | Razr 50 has a slightly higher resolution, resulting in marginally sharper images. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both displays provide smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Peak Brightness | Not specified | 3000 nits | Razr 50's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Missing Xperia 1 VI data limits comparison. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Dimensity 7300X | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers significantly higher performance for demanding tasks and gaming. |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Xperia 1 VI's CPU architecture provides a noticeable performance advantage in multitasking and demanding applications. |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 750 delivers superior graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications. |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | Both phones offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking. |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | Both phones offer the same storage capacity. |
| Camera | |||
| Video Capabilities | Up to 4K@120fps (HDR, OIS, EIS) | Up to 4K@30fps (EIS) | Xperia 1 VI boasts significantly more advanced video recording capabilities, including higher frame rates, HDR, and optical image stabilization. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | Xperia 1 VI offers longer battery life due to its larger capacity. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:
- Significantly higher performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a substantial advantage in processing power and graphics rendering.
- Superior video recording: Offers higher resolution, frame rates, and stabilization for professional-grade video capture.
- Longer battery life: The larger 5000 mAh battery provides more usage time.
Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:
- Foldable design: Offers unparalleled portability and a unique form factor.
- Brighter display: The 3000 nit peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Sony Xperia 1 VI: Ideal for power users, gamers, content creators, and those who prioritize performance and battery life.
Motorola Razr 50: Best suited for users who prioritize portability and style, value a compact form factor, and require good outdoor screen visibility.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Is portability your top priority? If so, the Razr 50's foldable design is a compelling option.
- Do you need the best possible performance for gaming or content creation? The Xperia 1 VI's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a significant advantage.
- How important is battery life? The Xperia 1 VI's larger battery capacity provides longer usage time.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Frequent traveler: Razr 50 for its compact size.
- Mobile gamer: Xperia 1 VI for its superior performance.
- Content creator: Xperia 1 VI for its advanced video recording capabilities.
- Average user: Either phone could be suitable depending on individual priorities regarding portability versus performance and battery life. Consider the price difference.
