Sony Xperia 1 IV vs Motorola Moto G32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 11, 2022 August 16, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 96.06 cm³ 101.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 185 g 184 g
Height 165 mm 161.8 mm
Width 71 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1644 x 3840 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 643 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.05 mAh/cm³ 49.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Sony Xperia 1 IV vs. Motorola Moto G32: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Sony Xperia 1 IV and the Motorola Moto G32, two phones catering to vastly different needs and budgets. My goal is to arm you with the knowledge to choose the phone that best fits your life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSony Xperia 1 IVMotorola Moto G32Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165 x 71 x 8.2161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5Xperia 1 IV is slightly taller and narrower. Moto G32 might feel a tad bulkier.
Weight (g)185184Negligible weight difference in hand.
Display
TypeOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzXperia's OLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and smoother scrolling thanks to the higher refresh rate. Moto's LCD is more power-efficient but lacks the visual punch.
Resolution1644 x 38401080 x 2400Xperia boasts a significantly sharper, more detailed display due to its 4K resolution. Noticeably better for media consumption and visually demanding tasks.
PPI643405Reinforces the Xperia's superior sharpness. Text and images will appear crisper.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1Snapdragon 680 4GXperia's flagship processor delivers significantly faster performance for demanding games, multitasking, and intensive applications. Moto's mid-range chip handles everyday tasks well but will struggle with heavy lifting.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)Xperia's CPU architecture, featuring a powerful Cortex-X2 core, ensures snappy responsiveness and effortless handling of complex tasks.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 610Xperia's GPU provides a substantial advantage in gaming performance, allowing for higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in visually demanding titles.
RAM12GB4/6/8GB depending on configurationMore RAM in the Xperia allows for seamless multitasking and keeps apps running in the background without reloading.
Camera
Main Camera12MP, f/1.750MP, f/1.8While the Moto boasts higher megapixels, the Xperia's larger sensor pixels (1.8µm vs. 0.64µm) generally capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance and potentially richer dynamic range. Real-world image quality will depend on processing.
VideoUp to 4K@120fps1080p@30fpsXperia offers vastly superior video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution at up to 120 frames per second.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable longevity. However, the Xperia's more powerful components and higher resolution display could consume more power.

2. Key Insights

The Xperia 1 IV is a no-compromise flagship designed for power users, content creators, and mobile photography enthusiasts. Its stunning 4K OLED display, blazing-fast performance, and advanced camera system are its standout features.

The Moto G32, on the other hand, is a budget-friendly option prioritizing practicality and affordability. It offers a decent display, respectable battery life, and sufficient performance for everyday tasks.

Trade-offs: The Xperia 1 IV comes with a premium price tag. Its power-hungry components might also impact battery life despite the large capacity. The Moto G32 compromises on performance and display quality but offers excellent value for its price.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xperia 1 IV: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a brilliant display for media consumption and gaming, and a versatile camera system for capturing high-quality photos and videos. This includes mobile gamers, content creators, and tech enthusiasts.

Moto G32: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize essential smartphone functions like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. This phone is perfect for students, casual users, and those seeking a reliable secondary device.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Xperia 1 IV is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Gaming, content creation, or everyday tasks?
  3. How important is display quality and performance to you?

Scenario-based recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: Xperia 1 IV
  • Budget-conscious student: Moto G32
  • Photographer/Videographer: Xperia 1 IV
  • Casual user: Moto G32

My Choice: Sony Xperia 1 IV

While the Moto G32 offers great value, I would choose the Sony Xperia 1 IV. I value a premium display experience, especially for media consumption and gaming. The Xperia's 4K OLED screen and powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chip are major draws for me. Additionally, as a tech enthusiast, I appreciate having cutting-edge performance and a versatile camera system at my fingertips, even if it comes at a higher cost. The smoother 120Hz display and the potential for professional-grade video recording are features I would utilize regularly. I am willing to accept the potential trade-offs in battery life for the significant gains in performance and visual fidelity.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.