Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Sony Xperia 1 III and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. These are two very different beasts, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Buckle up; we're going deep into the specs to see how they translate to real-world experiences.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a table breaking down the key specifications, focusing on how they impact your daily use:
Feature | Sony Xperia 1 III | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm, 186g | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm, 181g | The Xperia is taller and thicker but narrower; A73 is wider and thinner; Xperia has a more premium feel and is more comfortable in hand, A73 is lighter and more pocketable |
Build | Gorilla Glass Victus, Aluminum Frame | Gorilla Glass 5, Plastic Frame | Xperia offers the very latest glass and a stronger frame, better for drops and scratches. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.7" | A73 offers slightly more screen real estate; Both sizes are large enough for comfortable media consumption, but the Xperia is easier to use one handed |
Resolution | 1644x3840 | 1080x2400 | Xperia's significantly higher resolution makes for incredibly crisp text and images; Great for users who value image quality, and those who want to use it for professional photo editing. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 643 | 393 | Xperia's display is noticeably sharper; A higher PPI means a better viewing experience, especially for fine details. |
Technology | OLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. OLED has better color reproduction and is used in high end television screens and camera monitors, AMOLED is known for more saturated images and deep blacks that result in good contrast |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, making day to day use more enjoyable, as well as making games feel smooth and responsive. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both have identical peak brightness at 0 nits (likely a data issue here, both phones are designed to be used outdoors but both phones have an unlisted screen brightness here) |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Xperia's higher-end chipset offers significantly better processing power, better for demanding tasks, gaming, and heavy multitasking; A73 chip is very capable but is more suitable for day-to-day tasks. |
AnTuTu Score | 889,100 | 575,551 | Xperia has significantly higher performance in benchmarks; Indicative of faster app loading, smoother multitasking and gaming performance compared to A73. |
GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 642L | Xperia's superior GPU handles intensive graphics better; Crucial for gamers and users who edit videos or use intensive apps on their phones. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera (Rear) | 12MP, f/1.7 | 108MP, f/1.8 | A73 has higher resolution but the Xperia has a wider aperture; This implies that A73 is better for detail and sharpness in good light and Xperia has better low-light performance. |
Selfie Camera | 8MP, f/2.0 | 32MP, f/2.2 | A73 has higher resolution but slightly narrower aperture; A73's selfies will be sharper but Xperia might have better low-light performance, both are designed to be used in good light, but it may have a slight edge in very low light. |
Telephoto Lens | 12MP, f/2.2 | None | Xperia provides optical zoom for detailed shots from a distance; A73 can only achieve this using a digital crop. |
Wide Angle Lens | 12MP, f/2.3 | 12MP, f/2.2 | A73 slightly wider aperture may provide better images with wide angle in low light |
ToF 3D sensor | Yes | None | Xperia has better depth sensing for portrait mode, as well as AR applications. |
Portrait mode (depth) | None | 5MP, f/2.4 | A73 has an additional portrait lens, for enhanced depth information compared to using a single camera. |
Macro Lens | None | 5MP, f/2.4 | A73 has an additional macro lens, for close up photos with great detail. |
Video | Up to 4K@120fps, HDR, OIS, EIS | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS | Xperia has a very powerful video recording suite, capable of 4K video at 120fps, also has OIS (optical image stabilization); A73 is limited to 4K 30fps, with EIS only. |
DxOMark | 105 overall, 107 photo, 92 video | Not tested | Xperia has a very good score for overall mobile camera performance. |
Camera Features | OIS, EIS, RAW, Optical zoom | OIS, EIS | Xperia has better control over image output, and better zoom quality. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | A73 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life; Xperia will still last a day, but if you are a heavy user you may require to charge before bed. |
Charging | 30W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | Xperia charges slightly faster; A larger capacity battery in the A73 combined with slightly slower charging results in a longer charge time. |
Software | |||
Operating System | Android 11, upgradable to 13 | Android 12, upgradable to 16 | A73 is on a newer version of Android with a longer software update window. |
Connectivity | |||
WiFi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6 | Both support the latest WiFi standards for fast internet. |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 | Xperia has a newer Bluetooth version for better connectivity, more features and power efficiency. |
GPS | More comprehensive | Basic | Xperia offers better location accuracy with more satellite support. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 256GB/512GB | 128GB/256GB | Xperia offers a larger max storage capacity. |
RAM | 12GB | 6GB/8GB | Xperia provides better multitasking performance and smoother running apps, especially when you have multiple apps open. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phones support expandable storage |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Xperia has Hi-Res Audio capabilities for audiophiles and better audio immersion. |
Security | |||
Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Xperia has a faster, more convenient fingerprint scanner. |
Sensors | |||
Suite | Comprehensive Sensor Suite, Barometer | Comprehensive Sensor Suite, Ultrasonic Proximity Virtual, RGB | Xperia offers additional sensors including Proximity and barometer, the A73 offers some sensors in return. Overall both offer a great suite of sensors, with the Xperia slightly ahead. |
2. Key Insights
Sony Xperia 1 III: The Powerhouse with a Focus on Visuals and Audio
- Strengths: The Xperia 1 III shines with its top-tier performance thanks to the Snapdragon 888 chipset, the stunningly sharp 4K OLED display, and advanced camera capabilities, including optical zoom and better video features. Its audio features, including Hi-Res Audio and LDAC, cater to audiophiles. It is made of premium materials and has a robust sensor suite.
- Competitive Advantage: The Xperia provides a superior media experience with its incredible display and audio capabilities. The side-mounted fingerprint scanner provides a modern feeling and is very quick and responsive. It's also designed for professionals and serious enthusiasts.
- Trade-offs: The Xperia has a smaller battery and potentially shorter battery life compared to the Samsung Galaxy A73. It lacks additional camera modes such as macro and portrait modes that the A73 offers.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: The Everyday Workhorse
- Strengths: The Galaxy A73 5G balances performance and affordability with its decent Snapdragon 778G chipset, 108MP main camera, and larger battery. It provides a more modern Android experience and has a longer software update window, as well as more useful camera modes than the Xperia.
- Competitive Advantage: The A73 has a longer software update cycle, a larger battery and more camera features such as a macro and a portrait sensor, which makes it a great all-rounder. It's designed for a wide audience that want all day battery life, solid camera capabilities and a larger screen.
- Trade-offs: The A73 doesn't have the premium build or high-end performance of the Xperia. Its display and camera performance are good but not exceptional.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Sony Xperia 1 III:
- Best for: Tech enthusiasts, photography and videography professionals, media creators, audiophiles, mobile gamers, and anyone who values a premium experience.
- Use Cases:
- Shooting high-quality videos and photos with advanced control.
- Enjoying movies and games with the highest visual fidelity.
- Performing intensive mobile tasks without slowdown.
- Listening to high-quality music with Hi-Res Audio.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G:
- Best for: Everyday users, social media users, casual photographers, anyone looking for a long-lasting and reliable device.
- Use Cases:
- Day-to-day tasks, browsing, and social media.
- Casual photography with versatile camera features.
- Longer battery life for all-day use without worry.
- Enjoying media on a large, vibrant screen.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
- What are my primary use cases? If you’re a heavy gamer or content creator, the Xperia 1 III is the better option; if you primarily need all-day battery life, long software support and solid camera features, the A73 is the one.
- How important is visual and audio quality? The Xperia 1 III offers a superior display and audio experience, a definite selling point for media enthusiasts.
- What is my budget and how important is longevity? The A73 offers excellent value and a longer software update window. The Xperia is a more expensive option but will offer a superior experience if you make use of the features it provides.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: The Power User
- Recommendation: Sony Xperia 1 III
- Reason: Demanding applications require the power of the Snapdragon 888 chip, and you’d make use of the screen and audio features offered by the phone.
- Scenario 2: The Social Sharer
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Reason: The camera features are perfect for social media, and the large battery will ensure you last through the day.
- Scenario 3: The Media Lover
- Recommendation: Sony Xperia 1 III
- Reason: The 4K OLED screen with Hi-Res audio capabilities makes it a multimedia powerhouse.
Which would I Choose?
If I were to choose, I'd go with the Sony Xperia 1 III. As a tech journalist and someone who values high-fidelity experiences, the superior display, enhanced audio capabilities, better camera suite for video and RAW capabilities and the sheer power of the Snapdragon 888 are just too compelling. While the A73 is an excellent all-rounder, the Xperia's ability to deliver a truly premium and immersive experience is what would draw me to it. I tend to value the camera features offered on the Sony, as well as the ability to capture high quality video which can be used in editing and video creation.