Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 11, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 122.74 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 253 g 171 g
Height 154.9 mm 161.9 mm
Width 129.9 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 6.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Phantom Black
  • Gray
  • Cream
  • Icy Blue
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 7.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1812 x 2176 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 91.1 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 373 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 76.18 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 35.85 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Motorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1 mm (folded)161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mmFold5 significantly more compact when folded, but thicker; Moto G85 more pocketable when unfolded.
Weight253g171gFold5 noticeably heavier; Moto G85 easier to hold for extended periods.
FoldableYesNoFold5 offers a larger screen in a smaller form factor; Moto G85 is a traditional slab phone.
Display
Size7.6" (unfolded), Cover screen: Not specified6.67"Fold5 provides a tablet-like experience when unfolded; Moto G85 has a large, standard display.
TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XP-OLEDFold5 likely offers superior color accuracy and contrast; Moto G85 may have slightly less vibrant colors but still good quality.
Resolution1812 x 21761080 x 2400Fold5 offers significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density; Moto G85 is sharp enough for most users.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsMoto G85's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Fold5's brightness is unknown but likely high-end.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 6s Gen 3Fold5 offers significantly faster processing and graphics performance for demanding tasks and gaming; Moto G85 provides good performance for everyday use.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Fold5's CPU architecture is more powerful and efficient.
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 619Fold5 provides a superior gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM12GB12GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage512GB/1TB256GBFold5 offers more storage options for users with large media libraries.
Battery
Capacity4400 mAh5000 mAhMoto G85 likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity and less demanding hardware; Fold5's battery life may be impacted by the larger, high-resolution display.
Camera
Video Capabilities8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, etc.1080p@30/60fpsFold5 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates. Information about photo capabilities is missing for both phones.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a larger screen real estate in a pocketable device.
  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and graphics for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density for a more detailed visual experience.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Supports higher resolutions and frame rates.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Pocketable (unfolded): Easier to hold and carry for extended use.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity combined with less power-hungry hardware.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Better screen visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Lower Price (Likely): While both are mid-range, the Moto G85 is likely more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: Ideal for power users, multitaskers, content creators, and those who value a large screen for productivity and entertainment on the go.

Motorola Moto G85: Suitable for users who prioritize battery life, affordability, and a large, bright display for everyday tasks, media consumption, and casual gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability versus screen size?
  2. What is your budget and what level of performance do you need?
  3. Do you prioritize battery life or cutting-edge features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Focus on Battery Life: Moto G85
  • Power User, Multitasking Focused: Fold5
  • Content Creator, Needs Large Screen: Fold5

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

While the Moto G85 offers excellent value, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5's innovative foldable design and superior performance are compelling. The larger screen enhances productivity and media consumption, outweighing the trade-offs of higher price and potentially shorter battery life. The significantly faster processor future-proofs the device, ensuring a smooth user experience for years to come. As someone who values cutting-edge technology and multitasking capabilities, the Fold5 aligns better with my needs. The lack of detailed camera specifications for both phones prevents a complete assessment, but the Fold5's superior video capabilities suggest an overall advantage in this area as well.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.