Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 25, 2022 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 127.12 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.89 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 263 g 181 g
Height 155.1 mm 161.1 mm
Width 130.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 6.3 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Burgundy
  • Graygreen
  • Beige
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 7.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1812 x 2176 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 373 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 76.18 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 34.61 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs. Xiaomi Poco F5: A Detailed Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Xiaomi Poco F5 represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While both fall into the "medium price" range, their target audiences and core strengths differ significantly. Let's dissect their specifications and uncover what these differences mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Fold4Xiaomi Poco F5Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mm (folded)161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mmFold4 is significantly more compact when folded, but thicker and heavier. Poco F5 is a standard slab design.
Weight263g181gFold4's weight is noticeable, especially in one hand. Poco F5 feels lighter and easier to manage.
FoldableYesNoFold4 offers a unique, expansive inner display for multitasking and media consumption.
Display
TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Fold4's folding capability is the key differentiator.
Size7.6" (Main), 6.2" (Cover)6.67"Fold4's main display provides a tablet-like experience. Poco F5 has a large, traditional screen.
Resolution1812 x 2176 (Main), 832 x 2268 (Cover)1080 x 2400Fold4 boasts higher resolution, especially on the main display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2Fold4's processor offers a slight edge in raw power, but both deliver excellent performance for everyday tasks.
RAM12GB8/12GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking; 12GB ensures smooth performance even with demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera50MP64MPBoth offer high-resolution sensors. Image quality will depend more on processing and software.
Video8K@24fps4K@30fpsFold4 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity4400mAh5000mAhPoco F5 has a larger battery, likely translating to longer usage time on a single charge.
Fast Charging25W67WPoco F5 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Form Factor: The Fold4's folding design is its defining feature. It offers a truly unique experience, transforming from a pocketable phone to a mini-tablet. The Poco F5, while not as innovative, provides a more traditional, familiar smartphone experience.
  • Performance: While the Fold4 might have a slight edge in benchmark scores, both phones deliver smooth performance for most tasks. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is surprisingly powerful and efficient.
  • Camera: Both phones boast impressive camera specifications. Real-world image quality will depend on factors beyond megapixel count, such as image processing and software optimization. The Fold4 having a DxOMark score provides a quantifiable metric indicating its likely superior image quality.
  • Battery and Charging: The Poco F5's larger battery and significantly faster charging are major advantages. The Fold4's battery life might be a concern for heavy users, given its power-hungry display and processor.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Fold4: Ideal for power users, multitaskers, and content creators who value the larger screen real estate and portability. The unique form factor allows for unparalleled productivity and media consumption on the go.
  • Poco F5: Suitable for users seeking a powerful, well-rounded smartphone with excellent battery life and fast charging at a more affordable price. Gamers and those who prioritize long usage sessions will appreciate the Poco F5's endurance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Do you prioritize portability or screen size? If portability is key, the folded Fold4 is surprisingly compact. If you crave a large screen for productivity and entertainment, the unfolded Fold4 or the Poco F5's large display are strong contenders.
  • What's your budget? The Fold4 commands a premium due to its innovative folding technology. The Poco F5 offers exceptional value for its price.
  • How important is battery life and charging speed? The Poco F5 excels in this area. If you're a heavy user, the Fold4's battery life might be a limiting factor.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

While the Galaxy Z Fold4 is undeniably innovative and captivating, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F5. My decision is based on a combination of practicality, value, and personal preferences.

The Poco F5 offers exceptional performance, a vibrant display, and outstanding battery life with blazing-fast charging, all at a significantly lower price point. As a tech journalist, I'm constantly on the go, relying heavily on my phone for communication, research, and content creation. The Poco F5's long battery life and quick charging capabilities are crucial for my workflow.

While I admire the Fold4's groundbreaking design, its higher price and potentially shorter battery life are significant trade-offs for me. The added bulk and weight of the Fold4 are also deterrents. I prioritize a reliable, long-lasting device that can keep up with my demanding usage patterns without constantly searching for a charger. The Poco F5 strikes the perfect balance between performance, battery life, and affordability, making it the ideal choice for my needs. The Fold4's folding screen, while cool, isn't a feature I need daily.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.