Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 27, 2021 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 129.7 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.8 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 271 g 192 g
Height 158.2 mm 168 mm
Width 128.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 6.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Phantom Silver
  • Phantom Green
  • Thom Browne Edition
  • Wooyoungmi Edition
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 7.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1768 x 2208 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.7 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 374 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 76.18 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 33.92 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's break down these two very different smartphones, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G and the Xiaomi Poco C65. We've got a cutting-edge foldable versus a budget-friendly workhorse, so this is going to be an interesting comparison.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a table comparing the specs, focusing on what these numbers mean for the user:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GXiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardFoldable offers tablet-like experience; Standard is conventional.
Dimensions158.2 x 128.1 x 6.4 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmFold3 is wider when unfolded; Poco C65 taller, slightly thicker. Fold3 is more bulky.
Weight271g192gFold3 is significantly heavier, noticeable in daily use.
Display
Size7.6" (main)6.74"Fold3 offers much larger screen for immersive viewing/multitasking.
Resolution1768x2208720x1600Fold3 has far superior sharpness; Poco C65 is less crisp.
Pixel Density (PPI)374260Fold3: finer details; Poco C65: more pixelated.
TechnologyN/AIPS LCDPoco C65 has an LCD screen, while the Fold3 is unspecified.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzFold3 smoother scrolling and animations, Poco C65 decent but not as fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness (0 nits), and probably the provided data is incorrect.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5nm)Helio G85 (12nm)Fold3 is much faster, better for gaming and demanding apps. Poco C65 is slower, better for basic use.
AnTuTu Score898,700237,768Fold3 provides significantly better performance for games, heavy apps, and future-proofing. Poco C65 is limited.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G52 MC2Fold3: better graphics; Poco C65: suitable for less intensive graphics.
Camera
Main Camera12MP f/1.8, 1/1.76"50MP f/1.8, 1/2.76"Poco C65 has higher megapixel count, Fold3 has larger sensor (better in low light).
Selfie Camera10MP f/2.2, 1/3.2"8MP f/2.2Fold3 takes higher resolution selfies.
Telephoto Lens12MP f/2.4N/AFold3 has optical zoom; Poco C65 doesn't have it.
Wide Angle Lens13MP f/2.2N/AFold3 has an ultra-wide lens for more creative shots; Poco C65 does not.
Portrait LensN/A2MP f/2.4Poco C65 can take pictures with a depth effect. The Fold3 does not.
Macro LensN/A2MP f/2.4Poco C65 allows close up photos. The Fold3 does not.
Video Recording4K@60fps, HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsFold3 offers higher quality, more features; Poco C65 is very basic.
DxoMark Main Cam120N/AFold3 has better image quality in photos and videos
DxoMark Selfie Cam83N/AFold3 produces better selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity4400mAh5000mAhPoco C65 likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity.
Charging25W Fast Charge18W Fast ChargeFold3 charges slightly faster.
Wireless Charging15WNoFold3: convenient wireless charging
Software
OSAndroid 11 (up to 15)Android 13Poco C65 has a more modern operating system out of the box. Fold3 will upgrade eventually.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Fold3 has a more advanced WiFi standard, faster speeds and better performance.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3Poco C65 has newer version of Bluetooth
Storage
Internal256GB/512GB128GB/256GBFold3 has more storage options.
RAM12GB4GB/6GB/8GBFold3 has significantly more RAM, better for multitasking. Poco C65 is more limited.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Strengths:

    • Revolutionary Foldable Design: The standout feature is the large, foldable screen offering a tablet-like experience.
    • Top-Tier Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset delivers flagship-level performance.
    • Superior Display: Higher resolution and refresh rate offer a more vivid, smoother viewing experience.
    • Advanced Camera System: Telephoto and wide-angle lenses with OIS give more versatility and better quality photos and videos.
    • Premium Features: Wireless charging, reverse charging, and better build quality elevate the user experience.
  • Xiaomi Poco C65 Strengths:

    • Budget-Friendly Price: Offers good value for the price.
    • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity provides better battery endurance.
    • Modern Software: Ships with a more up-to-date version of Android.
    • Better portrait and macro cameras it offers more photography versatility for casual users.
    • Lighter and slimmer build Making it easier to carry around and use on the go.
  • Trade-offs:

    • Fold3: Expensive, bulky, heavier, less battery life.
    • Poco C65: Lower resolution screen, slower performance, less capable camera, limited to basic use.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:

    • Ideal User: Tech enthusiasts, professionals who multitask heavily, content creators, and users who want the ultimate mobile experience and are willing to pay for it.
    • Use Cases: Multitasking on the go, enjoying immersive content, mobile gaming, capturing high-quality photos and videos.
    • Recommendation: Great for those who want a premium experience and are willing to deal with its size and price.
  • Xiaomi Poco C65:

    • Ideal User: Budget-conscious individuals, students, users who prioritize battery life over high-end features, and need a reliable everyday phone.
    • Use Cases: Social media browsing, basic apps, casual photography, watching videos, general daily tasks.
    • Recommendation: A solid choice if you want an affordable phone with great battery life and adequate performance for everyday tasks.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to guide your decision:

  1. What's Your Budget? The Fold3 is premium-priced; the Poco C65 is budget-friendly. How much are you willing to invest?
  2. What Do You Value Most? The Fold3 is all about cutting-edge tech and productivity, while the Poco C65 focuses on affordability and practicality.
  3. How Will You Use It? The Fold3 excels in multimedia and productivity, while the Poco C65 is a reliable daily driver for basic tasks.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • If you're a power user who needs cutting-edge tech and a versatile device, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is your pick. You'll appreciate the foldable display, top performance, and premium features.
  • If you're a budget-conscious user who wants a reliable phone for everyday tasks, the Xiaomi Poco C65 is the way to go. You'll get a solid device with a long-lasting battery at a fraction of the cost.
  • If you want a phone with good cameras for everyday use but you are on a tight budget, the Xiaomi Poco C65 is your go to option you will get good quality pictures for social media and memories.
  • If you want the best camera quality and are willing to pay extra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is your choice. You'll get all of the extra features.

My Choice

Personally, if I were choosing between these two phones, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G, despite its higher cost and bulkiness. My reasons are rooted in my desire for a high-performance device that pushes the boundaries of what a smartphone can do. As a tech journalist, I frequently use my phone for research, writing, multitasking, and capturing photos and videos, and the Fold3's superior chipset, large screen, and versatile camera system would significantly enhance my workflow and creative process. The foldable screen offers a unique experience, and while the Poco C65's battery life is better, the features and performance of the Fold3 make it worth the trade-off. While the Poco C65 is great for everyday use and basic tasks, the Fold3 aligns with my needs and interests as a tech enthusiast.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.