Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 11, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 81.91 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 187 g 171 g
Height 165.1 mm 161.9 mm
Width 71.9 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 425 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1750 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.17 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5Motorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableCandybarFlip5 offers portability and novelty; Moto G85 provides a traditional, larger screen experience.
Dimensions165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm (folded)161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mmFlip5 is significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Moto G85 is thinner when unfolded but larger overall.
Weight187g171gFlip5 feels slightly heavier despite smaller size; both are relatively lightweight for their size.
Display
TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120HzP-OLED, 120HzFlip5's foldable screen offers unique usability; both offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors due to OLED technology and 120Hz.
Size6.7"6.67"Negligible size difference in practical usage.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Flip5 has a slightly taller aspect ratio; both offer sharp visuals.
Peak Brightness1750 nits1600 nitsFlip5 offers better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)Flip5 offers significantly faster processing and graphics performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & ...)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & ...)Flip5's CPU architecture provides superior performance in multi-tasking and demanding applications.
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 619Flip5's GPU provides a much better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM8GB12GBMoto G85 having more RAM might help with multitasking, but Flip5's superior processor will likely handle tasks smoother overall.
Storage512GB256GBFlip5 offers double the storage.
CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare without detailed camera specifications.
Battery
Capacity3700 mAh5000 mAhMoto G85 boasts significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vastly outperforms the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and superior gaming capabilities.
  • Brighter Display: The 1750 nits peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and a compact form factor.
  • More Storage: Double the storage capacity compared to the Moto G85.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000 mAh battery provides significantly longer usage time on a single charge.
  • More RAM: While the processor is less powerful, the larger RAM could improve multitasking for lighter applications.
  • Lower Expected Price: Given the specifications, the Moto G85 is likely more affordable.

Trade-offs:

  • Flip5: Sacrifices battery life for performance and portability. The foldable screen, while novel, introduces a potential point of failure.
  • Moto G85: Compromises on processing power and overall performance for longer battery life and a potentially lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, portability, and a unique, fashionable design. Best for demanding tasks, gaming, and those who value a compact phone.

Motorola Moto G85: Suitable for users who prioritize battery life and value for money. Best for everyday tasks, media consumption, and those seeking a large screen experience without breaking the bank.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Flip5 is likely more expensive.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? Demanding tasks and gaming (Flip5) vs. everyday use and long battery life (Moto G85).
  3. How important is portability? The Flip5's foldable design offers unmatched portability.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

While the Motorola Moto G85 offers tempting features like a larger battery and more RAM, the significantly superior performance of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is the deciding factor for me. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerhouse that ensures a smooth and responsive user experience, even with demanding tasks and games. I also highly value the compactness and portability offered by the foldable design, which aligns with my on-the-go lifestyle. While battery life is a concern, I am willing to compromise in this area for the significant performance gains and unique form factor. The larger storage capacity of the Flip5 also addresses my needs better. Finally, I am willing to invest more for a premium experience and cutting-edge technology.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.