Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 11, 2023 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 81.91 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 187 g 177 g
Height 165.1 mm 161.6 mm
Width 71.9 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 425 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.17 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5Motorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm (folded)161.6 x 73.8 x 8 mmZ Flip5 significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Moto G54 thinner when unfolded.
Weight187g177gNegligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableYesNoZ Flip5 offers unique form factor, compact portability; Moto G54 traditional slab design.
BuildGlass front & back, Aluminum frameMissing InformationDurability and premium feel comparison not possible without G54 build materials.
Display
Display TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCDZ Flip5: Superior contrast, vibrant colors, deeper blacks; Moto G54: Potentially better outdoor visibility.
Size6.7"6.5"Minor size difference; both offer large screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Comparable sharpness; Z Flip5 slightly higher pixel density (425 vs 405 ppi).
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1750 nitsMissing InformationZ Flip5 excels in bright outdoor conditions; G54 brightness comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm)Z Flip5 significantly more powerful, better for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Z Flip5 superior CPU performance in multi-core and single-core workloads.
GPUAdreno 740IMG BXM-8-256Z Flip5 offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and visual tasks.
RAM8GB8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage512GB256GBZ Flip5 offers double the storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity3700 mAh5000 mAhMoto G54 significantly larger battery capacity, likely longer battery life. Z Flip5 smaller battery due to foldable design constraints.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fps (HDR), 720p@960fps (HDR)Up to 1080p@60fpsZ Flip5 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording, plus slow-motion capabilities. Missing detailed camera specs for both phones limit in-depth comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Z Flip5 Advantages:

  • Form Factor: Unique foldable design for compact portability and stylish appeal.
  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and graphics for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Brighter, More Vibrant Display: Dynamic AMOLED 2X offers better colors, contrast, and outdoor visibility (compared to a standard IPS LCD).
  • More Storage: Double the storage capacity of the Moto G54.
  • Advanced Video Capabilities: Higher resolution and slow-motion video recording.

Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity likely translates to significantly longer usage time.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are mid-range, the Moto G54 might be more budget-friendly.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Z Flip5: Users who prioritize portability, style, a premium experience, and strong performance. Ideal for those who value a compact phone without sacrificing performance and are willing to pay a premium for the foldable design.

Moto G54: Users who prioritize battery life and value for money. Suitable for everyday users focusing on essential tasks like communication, web browsing, and media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is portability and style? Foldable design a priority?
  2. What's your budget? Z Flip5 likely more expensive.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Demanding tasks/gaming vs. basic usage.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

While the Moto G54 offers a compelling battery life advantage, the Z Flip5's superior performance, stunning display, and unique foldable design are decisive factors for me. I value the compact portability and premium experience the Z Flip5 provides. The significantly faster processor ensures smooth multitasking and handles demanding applications effortlessly, which is crucial for my workflow. While battery life is important, I'm willing to compromise slightly in that area for the overall superior user experience offered by the Z Flip5. The innovative form factor adds a unique appeal that outweighs the battery life difference for my personal preferences. I also highly value having ample storage, making the 512GB option of the Z Flip5 a significant advantage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.