Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 vs Motorola Moto G34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 11, 2023 December 29, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 81.91 cm³ 97.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 187 g 179 g
Height 165.1 mm 162.7 mm
Width 71.9 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84 %
Pixel Density 425 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1750 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.17 mAh/cm³ 51.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5Motorola Moto G34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm (folded)162.7 x 74.6 x 8.0 mmZ Flip5 significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Moto G34 thinner when unfolded.
Weight187g179gNegligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableYesNoZ Flip5 offers unique form factor and portability; Moto G34 traditional slab design.
BuildGlass front, plastic backMissing InformationDurability and premium feel comparison not possible without G34 build materials.
Display
Display TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCDZ Flip5: superior contrast, vibrant colors, deeper blacks; Moto G34: wider viewing angles potentially, but less vibrant colors.
Size6.7"6.5"Marginal size difference in practical usage.
Resolution1080 x 2640720 x 1600Z Flip5 significantly sharper and more detailed; noticeable difference in image and text clarity.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1750 nitsNot specifiedZ Flip5 offers exceptional outdoor visibility; G34 brightness unknown, limiting comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 695 5GZ Flip5 significantly more powerful; noticeable difference in demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Z Flip5 offers superior processing power; smoother performance in demanding applications and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 619Z Flip5 significantly better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB4GB/8GBZ Flip5 (with provided specs) offers superior multitasking capabilities.
Storage512GB128GBZ Flip5 provides significantly more storage space.
Battery
Capacity3700 mAh5000 mAhMoto G34 likely to offer longer battery life due to larger capacity and less demanding display/processor; real-world usage varies.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fps, 720p@960fps1080p@30fpsZ Flip5 offers significantly better video recording resolution, frame rates, and slow-motion capabilities. No detailed camera specs provided for still image comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Z Flip5 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful processor and GPU.
  • Sharper, brighter, and more vibrant display.
  • Foldable design for unique portability.
  • Much larger storage capacity.
  • Superior video recording capabilities.

Moto G34 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life due to larger capacity and less demanding hardware.
  • Possibly more affordable (depending on specific RAM/storage configuration).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Z Flip5: Users who value top-tier performance, a compact and stylish design, a vibrant display, and prioritize having the latest technology. Ideal for power users, content creators, and those who want a unique, pocketable device.

Moto G34: Users who prioritize battery life, affordability, and a simple, reliable smartphone experience. Suitable for casual users, budget-conscious buyers, and those who primarily use their phone for basic communication and web browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Z Flip5 is likely significantly more expensive.
  2. What level of performance do you need? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Z Flip5 is superior.
  3. How important is portability and design? The Z Flip5's foldable design offers unique advantages.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

While the Moto G34 likely offers longer battery life and a lower price point, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is the clear winner for me. Its vastly superior performance, stunning display, unique foldable design, and large storage capacity outweigh the potential benefits of the G34. The compact form factor of the Flip5 is a compelling feature for everyday carry. I prioritize performance and portability, and am willing to compromise on battery life for the significant gains offered by the Flip5. The lack of detailed camera specifications for the G34 makes a comprehensive comparison difficult, but based on the available data, the Flip5 appears to be the more compelling device overall.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.