Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Realme C53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C53
Realme C53
Realme

General

Launch Date August 25, 2022 May 31, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 81.96 cm³ 96.24 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 187 g 182 g
Height 165.2 mm 167.3 mm
Width 71.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki
  • Champion Gold
  • Mighty Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 426 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.15 mAh/cm³ 51.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs. Realme C53: A Detailed Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and the Realme C53 represent two distinct approaches to the smartphone market. One offers cutting-edge foldable technology at a premium, while the other prioritizes affordability and essential features. Let's delve into a comprehensive comparison to understand which device best suits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4Realme C53Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorFoldable ClamshellStandard SlabFlip4 offers portability and a unique form factor; C53 is a conventional smartphone design.
Dimensions (mm)165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 (unfolded)167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5Flip4 is significantly more compact when folded; C53 is larger overall.
Weight (g)187182Both phones are relatively lightweight.
Build MaterialsGlass front & back, aluminum framePlastic back, plastic frameFlip4 feels more premium and durable; C53 offers a more budget-friendly construction.
Display
TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCDFlip4 boasts superior contrast, vibrant colors, and deeper blacks. C53's display is adequate.
Size6.7"6.74"Both offer large screens suitable for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 2640 pixels1080 x 2400 pixelsFlip4 has a slightly sharper display due to the higher pixel density.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzFlip4 offers smoother scrolling and animations; C53 is still smooth but not as fluid.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Unisoc Tiger T612Flip4 delivers significantly faster processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & ...)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & ...)Flip4 offers superior multi-core performance for multitasking and heavy applications.
RAM8GB6/8GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for most users, though Flip4's larger RAM provides headroom for future apps.
Camera
Main Camera12MP (wide) + 12MP (ultrawide)50MP (wide) + 2MP(depth)While C53 boasts higher megapixels, Flip4 likely produces better image quality overall due to superior sensor and processing.
Selfie Camera10MP8MPFlip4's selfie camera likely offers better image quality.
Battery Life
Capacity3700 mAh5000 mAhC53 offers significantly longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging25W Fast Charging, 15W Wireless Charging33W Fast ChargingC53 charges faster despite a larger battery; Flip4 offers wireless charging convenience.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Flip4's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 significantly outperforms the Realme C53's Unisoc Tiger T612. This translates to a smoother user experience, faster app loading, and superior gaming capabilities on the Flip4.

  • Display: While both phones have large displays, the Flip4's Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and a higher refresh rate for a noticeably more premium visual experience.

  • Camera: Megapixel count isn't everything. The Flip4, despite having lower megapixel counts, likely produces better overall image quality due to its advanced sensor technology and image processing capabilities. Real-world performance will depend on factors beyond specifications.

  • Battery Life: The C53's massive 5000mAh battery significantly outlasts the Flip4's 3700mAh battery. If all-day battery life is a priority, the C53 has a clear advantage.

  • Form Factor: The Flip4's unique foldable design makes it incredibly compact and pocketable when folded, a significant advantage for those prioritizing portability.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Flip4: Best suited for users who value cutting-edge technology, a premium experience, portability, and are willing to pay a premium for the foldable form factor. Ideal for trendsetters, content creators, and those who demand top-tier performance.

  • C53: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life, a large screen, and essential smartphone functionality. Ideal for students, casual users, and those seeking maximum value for their money.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Flip4 is significantly more expensive than the C53.
  2. Is a foldable design a priority? If portability and a unique form factor are crucial, the Flip4 is the only option.
  3. How important is performance and camera quality? The Flip4 offers a significantly better experience in these areas.

My Choice:

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would select the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4. While the price premium is substantial, the innovative foldable design, superior performance, stunning display, and overall premium experience are compelling. The compact form factor is a significant advantage for me, as is the powerful chipset for demanding tasks and mobile gaming. While battery life is a consideration, I prioritize performance and portability in my daily workflow. The Flip4, despite its shorter battery life, aligns better with my needs and preferences as a tech enthusiast who values innovation and a premium mobile experience. The ability to easily slip the phone into a pocket without the bulk of a traditional smartphone is a game-changer for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.