Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 25, 2022 August 3, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 81.96 cm³ 104.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 187 g 190 g
Height 165.2 mm 161.7 mm
Width 71.9 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki
  • Black
  • Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 426 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1100 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.15 mAh/cm³ 47.68 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: A Detailed Comparison

The smartphone market offers a plethora of choices, and deciding between two compelling options can be challenging. Today, we'll dissect the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, two mid-range contenders with distinct strengths. This analysis goes beyond mere spec sheets, focusing on how these devices perform in the real world and which user profiles they best suit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4Nothing Phone (2a) PlusReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorFoldableCandybarFlip4 offers portability and novelty; (2a) Plus provides a traditional, larger screen experience.
Dimensions (mm)165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5Flip4 is significantly more compact when folded; (2a) Plus is thinner when unfolded.
Weight (g)187190Negligible weight difference in daily use.
Display
Size (inches)6.76.7Identical screen real estate for content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 26401080 x 2412Flip4 has a slightly higher pixel density due to a taller aspect ratio.
Panel TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; Flip4's foldable screen is unique.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Smooth scrolling and animations on both devices.
Peak Brightness1200 nits1300 nits(2a) Plus might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 7350 ProFlip4 boasts significantly more powerful CPU and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
RAM (GB)812More RAM on (2a) Plus aids multitasking, but Flip4's superior processor offers better performance.
OSAndroid 12 (up to 14)Android 14 (up to 17)(2a) Plus launches with a newer Android version and potentially longer software support.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)12.250(2a) Plus has a higher resolution main sensor.
Ultrawide (MP)1250(2a) Plus has a higher resolution ultrawide sensor.
Selfie (MP)1032(2a) Plus offers a much higher resolution selfie camera.
VideoUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@30fpsFlip4 can record higher resolution and frame rate video.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)37004700(2a) Plus has a substantially larger battery, likely resulting in longer usage time.
Charging25W wired, 15W Wireless50W Wired(2a) Plus charges significantly faster, no wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Flip4's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 significantly outperforms the Dimensity 7350 Pro in the (2a) Plus. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better overall responsiveness.
  • Form Factor: The Flip4's foldable design is its defining feature, offering unparalleled portability. The (2a) Plus provides a more traditional smartphone experience with a larger, uninterrupted display.
  • Camera: While megapixel count isn't everything, the (2a) Plus's 50MP sensors have the potential to capture more detail. However, real-world image quality depends on factors beyond resolution, including image processing. Flip4 offers more video recording features.
  • Battery Life: The (2a) Plus's larger 4700mAh battery likely provides significantly longer usage time compared to the Flip4's 3700mAh battery.
  • Software: The (2a) Plus benefits from a newer Android version and potentially longer software updates, guaranteeing security and feature enhancements for a longer period. Flip4 is upgradable to the newest Android as well.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Flip4: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and style. The compact form factor is perfect for on-the-go individuals who value pocketability. Its powerful processor ensures a smooth user experience, even for demanding tasks.
  • (2a) Plus: Best suited for users seeking a long-lasting battery and a large display for media consumption. The powerful cameras and the latest Android OS make it a well-rounded device for everyday use.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Do you prioritize portability above all else? If yes, the Flip4's foldable design is unmatched.
  • Is a long-lasting battery essential for your daily usage? If so, the (2a) Plus's larger battery capacity is a significant advantage.
  • Are you a heavy gamer or require top-tier performance? The Flip4's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers a superior experience.

My Choice: The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

While the Flip4's foldable design is undeniably cool, I would choose the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. The deciding factors for me are the significantly larger battery (a huge pain point in my daily usage), the newer Android version with extended support, the modern camera system, and the compelling price point. While I appreciate the Flip4's raw power, the (2a) Plus offers a more balanced package that better aligns with my needs for a reliable, long-lasting, and future-proof device. The lack of wireless charging is a minor inconvenience I can live with considering the other strengths of the (2a) Plus.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.