Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Motorola Moto G (2023) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 25, 2022 May 25, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 81.96 cm³ 103.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.58 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 187 g 189 g
Height 165.2 mm 164 mm
Width 71.9 mm 75 mm
Thickness 6.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki
  • Ink Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 426 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 82.42 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.15 mAh/cm³ 48.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and the Motorola Moto G (2023). These two phones occupy a similar price range but cater to very different needs and priorities.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Z Flip4Motorola Moto G (2023)Real-World Implications
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardFlip4 offers portability and a unique form factor; Moto G (2023) is a traditional smartphone design.
Dimensions (mm)165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9164 x 75 x 8.4Flip4 is significantly more compact when folded, Moto G (2023) is larger overall.
Weight (g)187189Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCDFlip4 boasts superior color accuracy, contrast, and brightness. Moto G (2023) is more basic.
Size (inches)6.76.5Flip4 offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2640720 x 1600Flip4 has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (426 ppi vs 270 ppi), resulting in crisper visuals.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 480+ 5GFlip4 offers significantly faster processing speeds and better graphics performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (3.19 GHz)Octa-core (2.2 GHz)Flip4's CPU is considerably more powerful.
RAM (GB)84Flip4 has double the RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)12.248While Moto G boasts higher megapixels, Flip4's overall camera system, including sensor quality and software processing, is expected to be superior based on DxOMark scores and historical performance of Samsung flagships.
Video4K@60fps1080p@30fpsFlip4 offers much higher video resolution and frame rates.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)37005000Moto G (2023) has a significantly larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer usage time.
Charging25W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingFlip4 charges faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Flip4 is a clear winner in terms of performance, thanks to its flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor. The Moto G (2023) is a budget-friendly device with a less powerful processor, making it suitable for basic tasks but not demanding applications or gaming.
  • Display: The Flip4's foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high brightness, providing a premium visual experience. The Moto G (2023)'s IPS LCD is decent but lacks the richness and contrast of the Flip4.
  • Camera: While the Moto G boasts a 48MP main sensor, real-world image quality often depends on factors beyond megapixel count. The Flip4, leveraging Samsung's expertise in camera technology, likely produces superior photos and videos overall.
  • Battery & Charging: The Moto G (2023) shines with its massive 5000mAh battery, promising longer usage on a single charge. However, the Flip4 compensates with faster 25W charging.
  • Form Factor: The Flip4's foldable design is its defining feature. It offers unparalleled portability and a unique user experience. The Moto G (2023) sticks to a traditional slab design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Flip4: Ideal for users who value portability, a premium display, strong performance, and a unique design. This phone is for those willing to pay a premium for cutting-edge technology and a compact form factor. Excellent for social media enthusiasts, content creators, and those who prioritize a high-quality visual experience.
  • Moto G (2023): Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and reliable performance for everyday tasks like browsing, calling, and messaging. A good option for students, seniors, or anyone seeking a simple, affordable smartphone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Flip4 is considerably more expensive. If price is a primary concern, the Moto G (2023) offers better value.
  2. What level of performance do you need? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Flip4 is essential. For basic usage, the Moto G (2023) is sufficient.
  3. How important is portability and design? The Flip4's foldable design is a major differentiator. If you prioritize compactness and a unique form factor, the Flip4 is the clear choice.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who values cutting-edge technology and appreciates the blend of performance and portability, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4. While the Moto G (2023) offers excellent battery life at its price point, the Flip4's superior display, powerful processor, and innovative foldable design are more aligned with my needs and preferences. The compact form factor is a significant advantage for someone constantly on the move and covering tech events. The ability to quickly capture high-quality photos and videos is also crucial for my work. While the price difference is substantial, the Flip4 offers a compelling combination of features and user experience that justifies the premium for my specific use case.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.