Okay, let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. This isn’t just about specs on paper; it’s about how these phones perform in your hands and fit into your life.
Specifications Breakdown
Feature | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Launch Date | 2021-08-27 | 2024-07-01 | ZTE is significantly newer, likely with more up-to-date software and features, but potentially less mature. |
Form Factor | Foldable | Standard | Z Flip3 is a unique, pocketable design but may have durability considerations; Blade A75 offers traditional reliability. |
Dimensions | 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm (unfolded) | 164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm | Z Flip3 is taller and thinner when unfolded; Blade A75 is wider and thicker overall. |
Weight | 183g | 189g | Z Flip3 is slightly lighter, which can improve comfort during extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.7" | 6.6" | Z Flip3 offers slightly more screen real estate. |
Resolution | 1080x2640 | 720x1612 | Z Flip3 is significantly sharper, with much clearer text and images. |
Pixel Density | 426 ppi | 267 ppi | Z Flip3 will deliver a visibly crisper display experience. |
Technology | IPS LCD | ZTE's IPS LCD is a reliable display technology, the Flip3 lacks this specification. | |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Z Flip3 will feel smoother and more responsive in everyday use. |
Brightness | 1200 nits | 0 nits | Z Flip3 offers superior visibility, especially in bright, outdoor conditions. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G | Unisoc T606 | Z Flip3 boasts a high-end processor from 2021, while the Blade A75 has an entry-level one. |
AnTuTu Score | 898,700 | 240,000 | Z Flip3 will be dramatically faster for almost any task, including gaming and multitasking. |
GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Z Flip3 offers a much better graphics experience, particularly for gaming. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 3300 mAh | 5000 mAh | Blade A75 has a much larger battery, likely offering better battery life than the Z Flip3. |
Charging | 15W | 22.5W | Blade A75 charges faster. |
Features | Reverse Charging | None | The Z Flip3 can reverse charge other devices, a handy feature if available. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera Resolution | 12.2MP | 50MP | Blade A75 has a higher resolution main sensor; Z Flip3 likely better image quality due to the sensor being from Sony (IMX563). |
Selfie Camera Resolution | 10MP | 8MP | Z Flip3 has a slightly better resolution front-facing camera. |
Wide Angle Lens | Yes | No | Z Flip3 offers more camera versatility with its wide-angle lens. |
Video Resolution | Up to 4K @ 60fps | 1080p @ 30fps | Z Flip3 offers significantly superior video recording capabilities. |
DXOMark Score (Mobile) | 111 | N/A | Z Flip3 has been evaluated by DXOMark and received a decent score overall with 118 in photo and 110 in video. |
Camera Features | OIS, Tracking AF | Digital image stabilization | Z Flip3 has optical image stabilization and tracking autofocus, for better low light performance and more stable video. The Blade A75 has digital image stabilization. |
Software | |||
Operating System | Android 11, upgradable to 14 | Android 13 | Blade A75 has a newer out-of-the-box OS. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | WiFi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 | Z Flip 3 has the most updated Wi-Fi Technology (802.11ax). |
Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.0 LE | Z Flip 3 has the most updated Bluetooth technology. |
GPS | L1+L5 | L1 | Z Flip 3 has more accurate and faster GPS. |
SIM | Nano SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano SIM | The Z Flip3 offers the flexibility of eSIM, convenient for international travel; Blade A75 offers dual nano SIM slots, useful for multiple numbers. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 128/256 GB | 128/256 GB | Both have similar storage options but lack expandable storage. |
RAM | 8 GB | 4/8 GB | Z Flip3 offers consistent 8GB of RAM, but A75 might be better if you only need 4GB but may suffer performance issues. |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | Stereo Speakers | DTS / DTS X | Z Flip3 has stereo speakers; Blade A75 has DTS/X. |
Security | |||
Security Features | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Both phones have standard fingerprint sensor technology. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Unknown | Z Flip3 has a more robust screen for drop and scratch protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Compass, Barometer, etc. | Basic set of sensors | Z Flip3 has a wider variety of sensors for advanced functionality. |
Key Insights
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
- Strengths: Premium, foldable design, significantly higher performance (chipset, GPU, AnTuTu score), superior display (resolution, brightness, refresh rate), better camera with OIS and Tracking AF, more advanced connectivity (Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1).
- Advantages: A true flagship experience with excellent responsiveness and gaming capabilities, much better for multimedia consumption, significantly better for outdoor visibility, and offers better quality video recording.
- Trade-offs: Lower battery capacity, potentially shorter battery life, more susceptible to damage in everyday use, and likely carries a higher price tag.
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Strengths: Much larger battery capacity, potentially better battery life, newer operating system, more affordable.
- Advantages: A budget-friendly option for everyday use and long battery life.
- Trade-offs: Significantly weaker performance, much lower display quality, inferior camera performance (especially video), lacks premium build quality, older connectivity standards, and not future-proof.
User Profiles and Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is ideal for:
- Tech Enthusiasts: Users who appreciate cutting-edge technology and are willing to pay for premium features.
- Multimedia Lovers: Individuals who frequently watch videos, play games, or create content on their phones.
- Power Users: Those who need a fast and responsive phone for multitasking, social media, and advanced applications.
- Style Conscious: Those who are drawn to its unique and compact foldable design.
ZTE Blade A75 4G is best suited for:
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users who prioritize value and longevity.
- Casual Users: Individuals who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calls, texts, and browsing.
- Battery Life Focused: Those who need a reliable phone that lasts all day, often without needing a charge.
- First-time Smartphone Owners: New to smartphones that are looking for an affordable option.
Buying Decision Framework
Here are three practical questions to help you decide:
- What is my budget? If budget is your primary concern, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is significantly more affordable. If you can spend more and want the most features, the Z Flip3 is the way to go.
- How important is performance? If you need a phone for intensive tasks like gaming or multitasking, the Z Flip3 is a clear winner. If you primarily use your phone for basic tasks, the Blade A75 may suffice.
- How important is battery life? If battery life is essential for you, then the ZTE Blade A75 is the winner.
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- Scenario 1: "I just want a reliable phone for calls, texts, and social media."
- Recommendation: The ZTE Blade A75 4G. It will handle these tasks without issue and last a long time on one charge.
- Scenario 2: "I need a high-performance phone for gaming and multimedia consumption."
- Recommendation: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G. The higher processing power, better screen and overall better camera makes this the winner.
- Scenario 3: "I want a phone that turns heads, but I also need good everyday usability."
- Recommendation: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G. This phone is a clear winner, due to its features and unique design.
My Choice and Why
For me, it would be the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G, even if it's a two year older phone. As a tech journalist and analyst, I value the cutting-edge technology, better performance, higher quality screen and more advanced features the most. While the battery life of the ZTE Blade A75 is undoubtedly appealing, I would rather have the premium quality of the Z Flip3, which offers the most enjoyable user experience. I value having a versatile device for everyday use and being able to take great photos and videos, with the additional bonus of having a one-of-a-kind compact, foldable device.