Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 16, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 343.94 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 1.98 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 627 g 193 g
Height 285.4 mm 168.4 mm
Width 185.4 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 6.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Lavender
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 12.4 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1600 x 2560 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 16:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 243 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 65.62 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 29.34 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 10090 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, Magnetic Connector USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+Xiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions285.4 x 185.4 x 6.5 mm168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3 mmThe Tab S9 FE+ is significantly larger, geared towards media consumption and productivity; Redmi A3x is a pocketable phone.
Weight627g193gTab S9 FE+ is much heavier, less suitable for one-handed use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials impact durability and premium feel, but we lack this information.
Display
Size12.4"6.71"Tab S9 FE+'s large display is ideal for multitasking and media; Redmi A3x is more portable.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nitsBoth offer smooth scrolling, but Redmi A3x specifies a typical brightness, suggesting better outdoor visibility. No information on peak brightness for the Tab S9 FE+.
Resolution1600 x 2560720 x 1650Tab S9 FE+ offers much sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density.
PPI243268Despite lower resolution, Redmi A3x has slightly higher PPI due to smaller screen size; difference in sharpness might be negligible in real-world use.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc T603 (22nm)Tab S9 FE+ boasts a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, resulting in smoother performance and better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzTab S9 FE+ has faster and more powerful CPU cores for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MP58 (Unspecified GPU Model)Tab S9 FE+ has a much more capable GPU for gaming and graphics-intensive applications. Missing details on the Redmi A3x's GPU limit a thorough comparison.
RAM12GB4GBTab S9 FE+ offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps.
Storage256GB128GBTab S9 FE+ offers double the storage.
Battery
Capacity10090 mAh5000 mAhTab S9 FE+ has a much larger battery, likely providing significantly longer battery life given its larger display.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi A3x ships with a newer Android version out of the box.
Max OS Version1716Tab S9 FE+ is expected to receive more OS updates, potentially providing longer software support.
Price RangeMediumLowSignificant price difference reflecting the performance and feature gap.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior processor, GPU, and RAM for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Larger, higher resolution display: Immersive media consumption and productivity.
  • Much larger battery: Potentially much longer battery life.
  • More Storage: Ample space for apps and files.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • More affordable: Budget-friendly option.
  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to carry and use one-handed.
  • Newer Android version out of the box: Access to latest features initially.
  • Potentially better outdoor visibility: Specified typical brightness (though we lack peak brightness for comparison).

Trade-offs:

  • Tab S9 FE+: Higher price for superior performance and features; larger size and weight might be less portable.
  • Redmi A3x: Lower performance and limited features for a budget price; smaller screen might be less suitable for media consumption and multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: Users who prioritize performance, large screen for media consumption and productivity, long battery life, and don't mind the larger size and higher price. Ideal for students, professionals, and entertainment enthusiasts.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability, portability, and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for calling, texting, browsing, and light social media usage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3x is a budget option, while the Tab S9 FE+ is a mid-range device.
  2. What is your primary use case? Media consumption, productivity, or basic communication?
  3. How important is portability? The Tab S9 FE+ is a large tablet, while the Redmi A3x is a compact phone.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+

While significantly more expensive, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ offers a far superior user experience thanks to its powerful processor, ample RAM, stunning display, and long-lasting battery. The performance difference would be noticeable in everyday use, from smoother multitasking to better gaming and media consumption. Although larger and heavier, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience, a large screen for productivity and entertainment, and long battery life. The Redmi A3x, while affordable, would likely feel sluggish and limiting in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.