Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer users.
1. Specifications Breakdown
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm | 162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm | S24 Ultra slightly narrower, thinner. M35 slightly taller. Negligible difference in hand. |
| Weight | 232g | 222g | S24 Ultra slightly heavier, likely due to larger battery and premium materials. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.6" | S24 Ultra offers a slightly larger viewing area. |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Super AMOLED | S24 Ultra boasts a more advanced display technology with potentially better color and brightness. |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 | 1080 x 2340 | Noticeably sharper visuals on the S24 Ultra due to higher pixel density (505 ppi vs 390 ppi). |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Peak Brightness | 2600 nits | 1000 nits (HBM) | S24 Ultra significantly brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Exynos 1380 | S24 Ultra expected to deliver significantly faster processing speeds and graphics performance. |
| CPU | Octa-core (Cortex-X4...) | Octa-core (A78/A55) | S24 Ultra utilizes more powerful CPU cores, resulting in superior multitasking and app loading. |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G68 MP5 | S24 Ultra's GPU provides a substantial advantage in gaming and graphically demanding tasks. |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | More RAM on the S24 Ultra enables smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications. |
| Storage | 512GB/1TB | 256GB | S24 Ultra offers significantly more storage for apps, media, and files. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | M35 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. |
| Other | |||
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 | Both run the latest Android version. |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 | Faster data transfer speeds on the S24 Ultra. |
2. Key Insights
The S24 Ultra positions itself as a flagship powerhouse, excelling in display brilliance, processing power, and overall performance. Its superior screen, faster chipset, and abundant RAM promise a premium user experience.
The M35, on the other hand, focuses on practicality with its larger battery and a more accessible price point.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
S24 Ultra: Power users, gamers, content creators, and anyone demanding top-tier performance and a stunning display.
M35: Budget-conscious users, casual gamers, and those prioritizing long battery life over peak performance.
4. Buying Decision Framework
- What is your budget? The S24 Ultra commands a higher price reflecting its premium features.
- What are your primary use cases? Demanding tasks? Casual browsing? Gaming?
- How important is battery life? The M35's larger battery might outweigh the S24 Ultra's performance advantages for some users.
My Choice: As a tech journalist who often pushes devices to their limits, the S24 Ultra is the clear winner for me. The superior processing power, stunning display, and ample RAM are essential for my workflow. While the M35's battery life is tempting, the S24 Ultra's overall performance and feature set better align with my needs. The difference in data transfer speeds (USB 3.2 vs 2.0) is also significant for quickly moving large files. I'm willing to invest in the premium experience the S24 Ultra provides.
