Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date February 17, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 113.58 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.91 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 234 g 202 g
Height 163.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Red
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Phantom Black
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Sky Blue
  • Lime
  • BMW M Edition
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1440 x 3088 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.5 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 500 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1750 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.02 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 740 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5S23 Ultra slightly shorter and narrower, Vivo X100 thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)234202Vivo X100 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
BuildGlass front & back, aluminum frameMissingDurability comparison impossible without Vivo X100 build material.
Display
Size (inches)6.86.78Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)1440 x 30881260 x 2800S23 Ultra significantly sharper due to higher pixel density (500 vs 452 PPI), resulting in clearer text and images.
Display TypeDynamic AMOLED 2XLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and contrast. LTPO on Vivo X100 allows for more granular refresh rate control, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)17503000Vivo X100 boasts significantly higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Dimensity 9300Both are high-end chipsets offering top-tier performance. Real-world differences likely minimal for average users, though benchmarks would clarify gaming performance differences.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & ...)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & ...)Both CPUs are powerful; slight core architecture differences may favor specific tasks, demanding further benchmarks for detailed comparison.
GPUAdreno 740Immortalis-G720 MC12GPU comparison requires benchmark data. Both are flagship GPUs capable of handling demanding games.
RAM (GB)8/1212/16Vivo X100 offers more RAM in its base configuration, potentially benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)20050S23 Ultra boasts much higher resolution, potentially enabling larger prints and more detailed crops. Sensor size and pixel binning information suggest superior low light performance for the Vivo X100.
Telephoto (MP)10+1064S23 Ultra offers dual telephoto lenses for greater zoom versatility. Practical zoom quality comparison needs sample images. Vivo X100's 64MP lens suggests a longer optical zoom range, though detail needs clarification.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 8K@30fpsMissingS23 Ultra offers extensive video recording options, including 8K. Vivo X100 video capabilities are unknown.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, though real-world usage varies greatly.
Fast Charging (W)45120Vivo X100 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution for crisper visuals.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Dual telephoto lenses and confirmed 8K video recording.
  • S Pen Support: Enables note-taking and drawing (not explicitly in specs, but a known feature).

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Lighter Design: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging time.
  • Larger Base RAM: Enhanced multitasking capabilities.
  • Potentially Superior Main Camera in Low Light: Larger pixel size and sensor on the Vivo's primary lens suggests better low-light performance

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra:

  • Power Users: Demanding users who prioritize a sharp display, versatile camera system, and S Pen functionality.
  • Content Creators: Professionals and enthusiasts who require high-quality photo and video capabilities.

vivo X100:

  • On-the-Go Users: Individuals who value a lightweight phone with fast charging and a bright display for outdoor use.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users focused on capturing stunning images, potentially even in challenging low-light conditions.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is S Pen functionality important? If yes, the S23 Ultra is the only option.
  2. Which aspects of display quality are prioritized? Sharpness (S23 Ultra) vs. brightness (Vivo X100).
  3. How important is fast charging? Vivo X100 offers a significant advantage in this area.

My Choice: vivo X100

While the S23 Ultra offers a compelling package, the vivo X100's combination of a bright display, fast charging, lighter weight, potentially superior low-light camera, and larger base RAM makes it the more appealing option for me. The slightly lower resolution is a minor trade-off for the significant gains in other areas. I prioritize comfortable one-handed use, quick charging, and excellent low light photography, all of which the Vivo X100 seems to deliver based on the available information. The lack of specific video capabilities for the Vivo is concerning, but ultimately not a deal breaker for my personal use. Finally, the price difference, while not explicitly stated in a comparable way, could further solidify the Vivo's value proposition if it is indeed offered at a lower price point.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.