Samsung Galaxy S23+ vs Xiaomi 13T Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 17, 2023 September 26, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 91.39 cm³ 104.37 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 196 g 200 g
Height 157.8 mm 162.2 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Phantom Black
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Lime
  • Black
  • Meadow Green
  • Alpine Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.9 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1750 nits 2600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 107.90 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.43 mAh/cm³ 47.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 740 Immortalis-G715 MC11

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S23+Xiaomi 13T ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)157.8 x 76.2 x 7.6162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5The Xiaomi is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)196200Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Xiaomi offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401220 x 2712Xiaomi has a sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Xiaomi's higher refresh rate will result in smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)17502600The Xiaomi's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility outdoors in direct sunlight.
HDRHDR10+, 1200 nitsHDR10+, Dolby Vision, 2600 nitsXiaomi supports Dolby Vision and higher HDR brightness for a superior HDR experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Dimensity 9200+Both are high-end chipsets offering excellent performance, though benchmarks may show minor differences.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.36 GHz X3...)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz X3...)Very similar CPU configurations, expecting comparable performance in most tasks.
GPUAdreno 740Immortalis-G715 MC11GPU performance might vary; more real-world testing needed for definitive comparison.
RAM (GB)812 (in tested configuration)Xiaomi offers more RAM in this configuration, potentially benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both have high-resolution main sensors. Image quality will depend on processing and sensor specifics.
Telephoto (MP)1050Xiaomi boasts a much higher resolution telephoto lens, enabling superior zoomed images and potentially better portrait mode.
Ultrawide (MP)12.213Similar ultrawide capabilities expected.
DxOMark Score133 (Overall)131 (Overall) - 135 Photo - 134 VideoScores suggest comparable overall camera quality, with Xiaomi potentially excelling slightly in still photography and video based on provided sub-scores.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)47005000Xiaomi offers a larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Fast Charging (W)45120Xiaomi supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Advantages:

  • More compact form factor
  • Potentially wider software update support from Samsung

Xiaomi 13T Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper, brighter display with higher refresh rate and Dolby Vision.
  • Larger battery with significantly faster charging.
  • Higher resolution telephoto camera.
  • More RAM in the tested configuration.

Trade-offs:

  • Xiaomi's larger size might not be ideal for everyone.
  • Samsung phones generally hold resale value better.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S23+: Users prioritizing a compact, premium feel with reliable software updates. Suitable for everyday tasks, moderate media consumption, and casual photography.

Xiaomi 13T Pro: Users who value performance, a top-tier display, long battery life with fast charging, and advanced camera capabilities, especially zoom photography. Excellent for mobile gaming, media consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What screen size and quality do you prefer? Compact or larger? Standard refresh rate or smoother scrolling?
  2. How important is battery life and charging speed?
  3. What is your budget and how much do you value camera capabilities?

My Choice: Xiaomi 13T Pro

While the S23+ is an excellent phone, the Xiaomi 13T Pro offers a compelling combination of superior display, performance, battery, and camera features for a similar price. The significantly faster charging and higher-resolution telephoto are major advantages for my usage. The slightly larger size is not a concern for me, and while software updates are a consideration, the tangible benefits of the 13T Pro outweigh this potential drawback. The 144Hz refresh rate and brighter display will provide a noticeably better media consumption and gaming experience. The 120W fast charging is a huge time saver. Lastly, the significantly improved telephoto lens offers greater versatility in photography.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.