Samsung Galaxy S23 FE vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 5, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.11 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.06 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 209 g 192 g
Height 158 mm 168 mm
Width 76.5 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Purple
  • Graphite
  • Mint
  • Cream
  • Indigo
  • Tangerine
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1450 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.86 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.4 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - International Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - International Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Xclipse 920 - International Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S23 FEXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmThe Poco C65 is noticeably larger and slightly thicker.
Weight209g192gThe S23 FE is slightly heavier.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and feel cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Size6.4"6.74"The Poco C65 has a larger screen, better suited for media consumption but potentially less pocketable.
TypeDynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCDThe S23 FE's AMOLED display offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1600The S23 FE has a much sharper display (403 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzThe S23 FE provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1450 nits600 nits (HBM)The S23 FE is dramatically brighter, making it much more usable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 2200 (4 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)The Exynos 2200 is a flagship-level chip from 2022, offering significantly better performance than the budget-oriented Helio G85.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The S23 FE has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, multitasking, and demanding tasks.
GPUXclipse 920Mali-G52 MC2The Xclipse 920 is a much more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones offer the same amount of RAM.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones offer the same amount of storage.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCamera quality cannot be compared without specific sensor and lens information.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsThe S23 FE supports much higher video resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhThe Poco C65 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, real-world battery life depends on many factors including display, processor efficiency, and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Advantages:

  • Significantly superior display: Brighter, sharper, more vibrant, and smoother.
  • Much more powerful performance: Handles demanding tasks and gaming with ease.
  • Higher quality video recording capabilities: Offers higher resolution and frame rates.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity: Potentially longer battery life, though real-world usage will vary.
  • Larger screen size: Better for media consumption.
  • Lower price: Appeals to budget-conscious buyers.

Trade-offs: The S23 FE sacrifices battery capacity and size for a vastly superior display and performance. The Poco C65 prioritizes affordability and battery size over performance and display quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, and a premium experience. Ideal for gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Users on a tight budget who prioritize battery life and a large screen for media consumption. Suitable for basic tasks, web browsing, and casual gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the S23 FE, while basic tasks and media consumption suit the Poco C65.
  3. How important is display quality? The S23 FE offers a vastly superior display.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

While the Poco C65 offers a larger battery and lower price, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE's superior performance, stunning display, and advanced features make it the clear winner for me. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to handle demanding tasks. The price difference is justified by the significant leap in overall quality and long-term usability. The S23 FE is a future-proof investment that will provide a better user experience for years to come. The brighter display alone makes a huge difference in outdoor usability, a key factor for me. While battery life is important, I'd rather have a slightly shorter battery life with a significantly better overall experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.