Samsung Galaxy S21 5G vs Motorola Moto G32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2021 August 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 85.33 cm³ 101.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 169 g 184 g
Height 151.7 mm 161.8 mm
Width 71.2 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom White
  • Phantom Gray
  • Phantom Violet
  • Phantom Pink
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.2 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.9 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 421 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.06 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.88 mAh/cm³ 49.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 2100 (5 nm) - International Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.80 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55) - International Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G78 MP14 - International Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 15 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G and Motorola Moto G32, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S21 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Dimensions151.7 × 71.2 × 7.9 mm161.8 × 73.8 × 8.5 mmS21 5G is more compact, making it easier to handle and pocket. G32 is larger, potentially less portable
Weight169g184gS21 5G is lighter, more comfortable for prolonged use. G32 is heavier, may feel bulkier.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S21 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Size6.2"6.5"G32 offers slightly more screen real estate, better for media consumption. S21 5G is more compact.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer sharp visuals.
PPI421405Both have good pixel density, but S21 5G is slightly sharper.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDS21 5G has superior contrast, black levels, and color vibrancy. G32's LCD is not as visually rich.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzS21 5G offers smoother scrolling and animations. G32 still has smooth animations but not as fluid as the S21.
Brightness1300 nits0 nits (spec missing)S21 5G has significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. Moto G32 brightness spec is missing.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S21 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
ChipsetExynos 2100 (5 nm) - InternationalQualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)S21 5G's chip is much faster, leading to smoother performance in apps and games. G32's chip is less powerful, suitable for basic tasks but may struggle with demanding applications.
AnTuTu Score749,100249,000S21 5G delivers significantly higher performance, noticeable in faster app loading and smoother multitasking. G32 will feel slower.
GPUMali-G78 MP14Adreno 610S21 5G's GPU provides a superior gaming experience with higher frame rates and smoother graphics. G32 is less capable in graphically intensive tasks.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S21 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Capacity4000mAh5000mAhG32 is likely to last longer on a single charge due to larger battery.
Charging25W fast charging30W fast chargingG32 charges slightly faster.
FeaturesWireless, Reverse ChargingNone of those.S21 5G offers convenient wireless charging and reverse charging for other devices. G32 lacks these features.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy S21 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Standard Camera12MP, f/1.8, 1/1.76" sensor, 1.80µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, 0.64µm pixelsS21 5G's larger sensor may capture better low-light images, despite lower resolution. G32's higher resolution may offer more detail in good lighting, but smaller pixel size indicates less light sensitivity
Telephoto64MP, f/2.0, 1/1.72" sensor, 0.80µm pixelsNoneS21 5G offers better zoom capabilities and portrait mode. G32 lacks optical zoom
Selfie Camera10MP, f/2.2, 1/3.2" sensor, 1.22µm pixels16MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixelsG32 has a slightly higher resolution selfie camera which may result in more detailed selfies. Pixel size is negligibly smaller in the G32 so light sensitivity will be similar
Wide Angle12.2MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55", 1.4µm pixel size8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm pixelsS21 5G has wider angle with better low light performance due to larger pixel sizes. G32's wide angle will struggle in low light.
MacroNone2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixelsG32 can take very close-up photos.
Video8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, EIS, OIS, Stereo Sound; Slow-motion: 960 fps1080p@30fps; Slow-motion: 120 fpsS21 5G offers significantly higher quality video recording and stabilization features.
DxOMarkMobile: 111, Selfie: 132No test scoreS21 5G has been benchmarked and its camera performance is better overall, with the selfie camera performing significantly better.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED panel with 120Hz refresh rate offers better visual experience, with vibrant colors and smoother animations.
  • Much Higher Performance: The Exynos 2100 chipset provides significantly faster processing for demanding apps and games.
  • Better Camera System: Offers more versatile camera options including a telephoto lens, better low-light performance due to larger sensors, and advanced video capabilities.
  • Additional Features: Includes wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and a barometer.
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus for better screen protection.
  • Better Audio Experience: Includes Noise Cancellation Microphone.

Motorola Moto G32 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery will likely provide longer battery life.
  • Slightly Faster Charging: 30W fast charging vs 25W.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.2 offers minor improvements over Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Lower Price Point: Typically positioned as a more affordable option.
  • More Camera Lenses: Offers dedicated wide and macro lens for a more versatile photo experience

Trade-offs:

  • The S21 5G sacrifices battery life for its higher performance and better display/camera. It also has a slightly higher price point
  • The Moto G32 sacrifices display quality, performance, and camera versatility for a lower price and better battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Ideal Users:

  • Power Users: Those who need a phone for gaming, video editing, and other resource-intensive tasks.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value a versatile and high-quality camera system.
  • Media Consumers: Those who want the best display experience for watching videos and browsing content.
  • Users who appreciate premium features: Wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, etc.

    • Use Cases: Gaming, photography/videography, mobile video editing, watching HDR content, multitasking with demanding apps, business users requiring fast processing, heavy users who spend a lot of time on their phones.

Motorola Moto G32 Ideal Users:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those who want a reliable smartphone without spending a lot of money.
  • Users Who Value Battery Life: Those who prioritize longer battery life over top-tier performance and other premium features.
  • Casual Users: People who mainly use their phones for social media, browsing, and basic apps.

    • Use Cases: Social media browsing, basic photography, everyday use, long-lasting device for travelers, users who don't need high end performance.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The S21 5G provides higher value for performance-focused users despite being older as its high end components are still performing well.
  • The Moto G32 provides higher value for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance for you?

    • If you need a phone for gaming and demanding apps, the S21 5G is the clear choice. If your usage is basic, the G32 will be adequate.
  2. How much do you value display quality?

    • If you want the best possible display for media consumption, the S21 5G is the way to go. The G32's LCD is just okay in comparison.
  3. Is battery life or camera quality your priority?

    • If battery life is crucial, the G32 is better. If you want a more versatile camera with better video recording, the S21 5G is the better option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High-Performance Gaming & Media

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy S21 5G. Its superior processor, graphics, and display make it a clear winner for intensive gaming and media consumption.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious Daily Driver

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G32. It offers a longer battery life and is more affordable, making it suitable for less intensive everyday tasks.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Focused

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy S21 5G. Its camera performance is significantly higher, and its optical zoom provides better versatility than the macro and wide angle on the Moto G32.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G. While the Moto G32 offers a better battery life and a more affordable price tag, the S21 5G's superior performance, AMOLED display, and camera capabilities outweigh its drawbacks. As someone who uses their phone for a variety of tasks, including gaming and photography, the performance and higher end components are crucial for my use case. The S21 5G is older but still performs well, and its features are much more aligned with my usage needs. The trade off in battery life for the features of the S21 are worth it to me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.