Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 93.85 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 176 g 213 g
Height 164.7 mm 161.1 mm
Width 77 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.28 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M53 and the Samsung Galaxy A55. Instead of getting bogged down in technical jargon, we'll explore how these devices translate into real-world experiences for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M53Samsung Galaxy A55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 4.1 based on Android 12One UI 6.1 based on Android 14A55 offers a more modern, potentially feature-rich interface with longer software support, leading to a fresher, longer-lasting experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationPotentially refined Android navigationA55 likely benefits from UI/UX improvements introduced in later Android versions, resulting in smoother, more intuitive interactions.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibilityEnhanced Android accessibilityA55 likely offers more comprehensive accessibility features, catering to a wider range of user needs and preferences.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (176g)Heavier (213g), slightly thickerM53 provides a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight. A55's added weight might be noticeable during extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a travel blogger capturing your adventures. The M53's higher resolution 108MP main camera might seem appealing for detailed landscape shots. However, the A55's Sony IMX906 sensor in its 50MP main camera, coupled with optical image stabilization (OIS) and superior video capabilities (EIS at 4K), translates to smoother, more stable videos even while exploring bustling markets or hiking uneven terrain. The A55 also boasts better low-light performance thanks to its Night Mode.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a user who prioritizes software updates and a modern interface, the A55's newer Android version and longer support window are crucial. The M53 might be more appealing to users who value a lighter, more comfortable phone for everyday use and aren't as concerned with having the latest software.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M53 emphasizes portability and ease of handling, while the A55 focuses on performance, camera quality, and a longer software lifespan.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A55. While the M53 offers a lighter build, the A55's significant advantages in performance (faster processor, more RAM), camera technology (OIS, better video stabilization, superior low-light performance), software (newer Android version with longer support), and build quality (Gorilla Glass Victus) create a more compelling overall user experience. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to make for these substantial benefits. The A55 aligns better with my focus on user experience, design innovation, and long-term value. It offers a more future-proof experience, capturing higher quality content and ensuring a smoother, more enjoyable interaction over time. The A55's design choices reflect a commitment to providing a richer, more satisfying mobile experience, which aligns perfectly with my analytical framework.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.