Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 93.85 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 176 g 185 g
Height 164.7 mm 164.6 mm
Width 77 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.28 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M53 and the Realme C65, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M53Realme C65User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI (Android 12)Realme UI (Android 14)M53 offers a familiar, customizable interface. C65 boasts a newer OS with potential design and feature enhancements.
Interaction Flow120Hz AMOLED display, Dimensity 90090Hz IPS LCD, Helio G85M53 delivers a significantly smoother, more visually vibrant experience due to the superior display and processor.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibilityStandard Android accessibilityBoth offer standard Android accessibility features. Further investigation needed for specific visual/auditory customization options.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (176g)Heavier (185g)Noticeable weight difference; M53 may be more comfortable for extended use. Similar dimensions suggest comparable one-handed usability challenges.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing vibrant cityscapes and detailed close-ups.

  • M53 Story: Sarah effortlessly frames a stunning sunset with the M53's 108MP main camera, capturing intricate details and vibrant colors thanks to the large sensor and AMOLED display's brilliant rendering. The wide-angle lens allows her to capture the expansive cityscape, while the macro lens reveals intricate details of a flower in a nearby park. The powerful Dimensity 900 processor ensures a lag-free experience as she edits her photos on the go.

  • C65 Story: Sarah uses the C65's 50MP camera to capture the sunset, but the smaller sensor and IPS LCD result in less detail and slightly washed-out colors compared to the M53. While she appreciates the faster 45W charging, the lack of a wide-angle and macro lens limits her creative options. The Helio G85 processor struggles slightly with complex photo editing.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: The Realme C65 offers faster charging and a newer Android version at a potentially lower price point.

  • For a visually impaired user: Both devices rely on standard Android accessibility features. Deeper research is needed to assess customization options like font scaling and color contrast adjustments.

  • For a power user: The M53's superior performance, vibrant display, and versatile camera system provide a more compelling experience for demanding tasks like gaming and content creation.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M53 prioritizes a premium visual experience and versatile functionality, reflected in its AMOLED display, powerful processor, and comprehensive camera system. The C65 focuses on core functionality and fast charging, potentially appealing to users seeking a more budget-friendly option with the latest Android version.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53. While the Realme C65 offers faster charging and a newer Android OS, the M53's superior display, performance, and camera system significantly enhance the overall user experience. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, combined with the powerful Dimensity 900 processor, creates a fluid and responsive interaction that is crucial for everyday tasks and demanding applications. The versatile camera system with its high-resolution sensor and additional lenses provides greater creative freedom for photography enthusiasts. For me, these factors outweigh the benefits of faster charging and a slightly newer OS version. The M53 delivers a more compelling and enjoyable user experience, making it the better choice in my opinion.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.