Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 93.85 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 176 g 186 g
Height 164.7 mm 167.2 mm
Width 77 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.28 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M53 vs. Realme C51: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M53 and Realme C51, focusing on how their design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Feature CategorySamsung Galaxy M53Realme C51User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz Refresh RateIPS LCD, 90Hz Refresh RateThe M53 offers a visually richer, smoother experience with vibrant colors and fluid animations. The C51's display is less responsive and visually appealing.
Interaction FlowDimensity 900, Higher Antutu ScoreUnisoc Tiger T612, Lower AntutuThe M53 provides a significantly faster and more responsive user experience, handling multitasking and demanding apps with ease. The C51 may feel sluggish.
AccessibilityStandard Android FeaturesStandard Android FeaturesBoth offer standard accessibility features, but specific implementations may vary. Further investigation is needed for a detailed accessibility comparison.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (176g)Heavier (186g)The M53 offers a slightly more comfortable handheld experience due to its lighter weight, especially during extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a travel blogger capturing your adventures. The M53's superior camera system, with its 108MP main lens and wide-angle capabilities, allows you to capture stunning landscapes in vivid detail. Its 4K video recording ensures professional-quality footage. Meanwhile, the C51, while capable, compromises on image quality and video resolution. The M53's faster processor also ensures smooth editing and quick uploads on the go.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A Tech-Savvy Gamer: The M53's powerful processor and higher refresh rate display cater to demanding gaming needs, providing a smooth and immersive experience. The C51's lower performance capabilities might lead to frustration for this user.

User 2: A Budget-Conscious Student: The C51's lower price point makes it an attractive option. While it compromises on performance and display quality, it offers essential smartphone functionalities. The M53 might be considered an unnecessary luxury for this user. The faster charging of the C51 might be a deciding factor for a student always on the go.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M53 prioritizes performance and visual experience, offering a premium feel. The C51 focuses on affordability, sacrificing some features for a lower price point.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53. While the Realme C51 offers a compelling price, the M53's superior AMOLED display, significantly faster processor, enhanced camera capabilities, and overall smoother user experience are crucial for my needs. As someone who values responsive performance, vibrant visuals, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos, the M53 aligns better with my usage patterns and expectations. The slight weight difference also contributes to a more comfortable long-term user experience. The investment in the M53 translates to a more enjoyable and productive mobile experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.