Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Motorola Moto G72 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 October 3, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 93.85 cm³ 94.34 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.98 "/g
Weight 176 g 166 g
Height 164.7 mm 160.5 mm
Width 77 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 88.1 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.28 mAh/cm³ 53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M53 vs. Motorola Moto G72: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the specs and explore these phones as complete user experiences, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world usability.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M53Motorola Moto G72User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 4.1My UXOne UI offers a more feature-rich, potentially overwhelming experience. My UX is known for its clean, near-stock Android feel.
Interaction FlowPotentially more complexSimpler, more intuitiveUsers seeking a straightforward experience might prefer the Moto G72.
AccessibilityStandard Android featuresStandard Android featuresBoth offer basic accessibility features, but deeper analysis is needed.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly larger, heavierSlightly smaller, lighterThe Moto G72 might be more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing everyday moments and sharing them online.

  • M53 Story: Sarah appreciates the M53's 108MP main camera and dedicated macro lens for detailed close-ups. However, she finds navigating the feature-rich One UI a bit overwhelming at times. The slightly heavier phone can also feel cumbersome during long photo sessions.

  • G72 Story: Sarah enjoys the G72's clean interface and intuitive camera app, allowing her to quickly capture and share photos. The lighter weight makes it comfortable to carry around all day. While the camera might not offer the same level of detail as the M53, its simplicity aligns with Sarah's desire for a seamless photography experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For Tech-Savvy Users: The M53 offers a wider range of features and customization options, appealing to those who enjoy exploring technology.

  • For Casual Users: The G72's simplicity and ease of use make it a great choice for users who prioritize a straightforward experience.

  • For Users with Accessibility Needs: Further investigation into specific accessibility features (e.g., text scaling, screen reader compatibility) is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these phones boils down to individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Features and Customization: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M53.
  • Prioritize Simplicity and Ease of Use: Choose the Motorola Moto G72.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Motorola Moto G72.

Why? My approach prioritizes user experience and accessibility. The G72's clean interface, intuitive design, and lighter weight contribute to a more enjoyable and user-friendly experience, particularly for a wider range of users. While the M53 boasts more powerful specs, they don't necessarily translate into a superior user experience for everyone. The G72's streamlined approach aligns better with my philosophy of making technology accessible and engaging for all. Faster charging is a significant advantage in today's fast-paced world. Finally, while benchmarks favor the M53, the G72's performance is more than adequate for everyday tasks. The difference in raw power is unlikely to be noticeable for the average user.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.