Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 September 28, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 93.85 cm³ 104.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.81 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 176 g 205 g
Height 164.7 mm 162.1 mm
Width 77 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple
  • Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1212 x 2616
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 91.3 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 428 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 103.46 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.28 mAh/cm³ 45.18 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 12 N/A
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M53 vs. Huawei Mate 50 Pro: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison that highlights how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M53Huawei Mate 50 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 4.1 (Android 12)EMUI 13Samsung offers a more familiar Android experience with broader app ecosystem access. Huawei's OS has limitations.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigation, 120Hz refresh rate120Hz refresh rate, potentially custom navigationBoth offer smooth interactions thanks to the high refresh rate. Differences arise mainly due to OS-level variations.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (176g), thinner (7.4mm)Heavier (205g), thicker (8.5mm)M53 offers a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight and slimmer profile.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresPotentially limited accessibility featuresM53 likely offers wider accessibility support due to the broader Android ecosystem.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, who loves capturing everyday moments and sharing them online.

  • M53 Story: Sarah appreciates the M53's 108MP main camera for its detail, enabling her to crop and zoom without significant quality loss. The wide-angle lens helps her capture breathtaking landscapes. However, she might find the lack of advanced features like optical image stabilization limiting in low-light conditions.
  • Mate 50 Pro Story: The Mate 50 Pro empowers Sarah with its superior camera system, featuring a larger sensor and wider aperture for stunning low-light performance. The optical zoom allows her to capture distant subjects with clarity. The advanced video features, including slow-motion and stabilization, let her create more dynamic content. However, access to Google apps & services is absent.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • User 1: Tech-Savvy Gamer: The Mate 50 Pro's powerful processor and GPU cater to demanding gaming needs. However, the lack of Google Play Games might be a deal-breaker. The M53 offers a decent gaming experience but might struggle with high-end titles.
  • User 2: Budget-Conscious User: The M53's lower price point and long-lasting battery make it attractive for budget-conscious users. The Mate 50 Pro offers premium features but at a significantly higher cost.
  • User 3: Professional Photographer: The Mate 50 Pro's advanced camera system, including optical image stabilization and a telephoto lens, makes it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts. The M53, while offering a high-resolution sensor, lacks the professional-grade features of the Mate 50 Pro.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M53 prioritizes affordability and ease of use, offering a familiar Android experience and a comfortable design. The Mate 50 Pro focuses on performance and advanced camera capabilities but compromises on app ecosystem access and affordability.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53. While the Mate 50 Pro boasts impressive hardware, particularly in the camera department, the limitations imposed by the lack of Google Mobile Services are significant for me. My user-centered approach prioritizes a seamless and accessible experience, which the M53 delivers through its integration with the wider Android ecosystem. The M53's lighter weight and slimmer profile also contribute to a more comfortable everyday usage, aligning with my emphasis on design ergonomics. Although its camera and processor are less powerful, they are more than adequate for my needs. Ultimately, the M53 offers a more balanced and inclusive user experience that aligns with my values.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.