Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 173 g 198 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. ZTE Blade V60 Design: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's explore the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and ZTE Blade V60 Design through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GZTE Blade V60 DesignUser Experience Impact
Display6.7" Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 1080 x 2400 pixels6.6" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 x 1612 pixelsM52 offers a significantly sharper, more vibrant, and smoother visual experience.
Dimensions/Weight164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm, 173g164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm, 198gM52 is slimmer and lighter, promoting comfortable one-handed use.
Build MaterialsPlastic frame and backPlastic frame and backSimilar build quality, potentially impacting durability and premium feel.
PPI393267Sharper text and images on the M52.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzSmoother scrolling and animations on the M52.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine scrolling through your social media feed. On the M52's vibrant Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the images pop, and the scrolling feels incredibly fluid, almost like flipping through a magazine. On the V60 Design's IPS LCD with a 90Hz refresh rate, the experience is less visually engaging and might feel slightly less responsive. The M52's superior display truly elevates everyday tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A young professional who values aesthetics and performance: The M52's slim design, vibrant display, and smooth performance align perfectly with their needs.

User 2: A budget-conscious student prioritizing basic functionality: The V60 Design's affordability and large screen size might be more appealing, despite the lower resolution display.

User 3: An older adult seeking ease of use: Both phones offer large screens for readability, but the M52's lighter weight might be preferable for extended use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52 prioritizes a premium visual experience and comfortable handling, while the V60 Design focuses on affordability and large screen size.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G.

Why? While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers a budget-friendly option, the M52's superior display (Super AMOLED Plus with 120Hz), slimmer and lighter design, and overall more powerful processor significantly enhance the user experience. For me, the investment in a smoother, more visually engaging, and more comfortable device is worthwhile. The difference in daily use would be substantial, making tasks from browsing the web to watching videos more enjoyable. The M52 feels like a more future-proof choice with its better performance and display technology. While price is a factor, the tangible benefits of the M52's user experience outweigh the cost difference in my opinion.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.