Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 173 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G

Let's embark on a journey to explore the contrasting worlds of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, not just as spec sheets, but as companions in our daily lives. We'll delve into their design philosophies, user experiences, and how they cater to our diverse needs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz refresh rateIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rateM52 offers vibrant colors, smoother scrolling, and better outdoor visibility, contributing to a more premium experience.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G, powerful GPU (Adreno 642L)Unisoc T606, less powerful GPU (Mali-G57 MP1)M52 provides significantly smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
Accessibility FeaturesOne UI, customizable, wide range of accessibility optionsStock Android 13, basic accessibility optionsM52 offers more personalized and inclusive user experience with greater control over device settings.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm), lighter (173g)Thicker (8.6mm), heavier (189g)M52 offers a more comfortable one-handed usage experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a passionate photographer capturing a vibrant street festival. The M52's superior camera system, with its 64MP main sensor and dedicated macro lens, allows you to capture crisp details and stunning close-ups. Its fast processor ensures minimal shutter lag, letting you freeze those fleeting moments of joy and energy. Meanwhile, the A75, with its basic 50MP camera and less powerful processor, might struggle to keep pace, potentially missing crucial shots and delivering less detailed images.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a tech-savvy user who demands performance and a premium visual experience, the M52's vibrant AMOLED display and powerful processor are a clear winner. However, for a budget-conscious user primarily focused on basic communication and simple tasks, the A75's affordability and large battery capacity might be more appealing. Users with visual impairments might benefit from the extensive customization options in One UI on the M52.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52's design philosophy prioritizes a premium, feature-rich experience, emphasizing performance and visual appeal. The A75, on the other hand, focuses on affordability and essential functionality.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an enticing price point, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its superior display, significantly faster processor, better camera system, and more refined design contribute to a significantly enhanced user experience. The investment in the M52 translates to a smoother, more enjoyable interaction with the device on a daily basis, justifying the price difference. Furthermore, the 5G connectivity future-proofs the device, ensuring faster data speeds and access to emerging technologies. In the long run, the M52's superior performance and features would provide a more satisfying and lasting user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.