Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 108.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 173 g 200 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 650 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 116.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 46.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5080 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's explore the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 GT through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi Poco X4 GTUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz refresh rateIPS LCD, 144Hz refresh rateThe M52 offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks, while the X4 GT boasts a smoother, more responsive visual experience due to the higher refresh rate.
Interaction FlowOne UI 3.1 (Android 11)MIUI 13 for POCO (Android 12)Both offer customizable experiences, but individual preferences for UI aesthetics and feature sets will determine the more enjoyable daily interaction.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth phones provide basic accessibility features, but further investigation into specific needs is recommended.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm) and lighter (173g)Thicker (8.9mm) and heavier (200g)The M52 provides a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight and slimmer profile. The X4 GT may feel bulkier in the hand.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student attending a fast-paced lecture. The X4 GT's 144Hz refresh rate ensures smoother scrolling through notes and presentations, minimizing motion blur and making quick navigation feel effortless. You can swiftly switch between apps without lag. Conversely, the M52's Super AMOLED Plus display brings your lecture slides to life with vibrant colors and deeper blacks, making images and videos more engaging.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the casual user: The M52's vibrant display and lighter design might be more appealing for everyday use.
  • For the gamer: The X4 GT's faster refresh rate and powerful processor offer a significant advantage.
  • For the budget-conscious: Both phones fall in the medium price range, requiring careful consideration of individual priorities.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these phones hinges on your individual priorities. If a visually immersive experience with a sleek design is paramount, the M52 is a strong contender. If responsiveness and speed for gaming or multitasking are more critical, the X4 GT takes the lead.

My Choice: The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

While the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G offers a compelling visual experience and slim design, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT. Its higher refresh rate is a game-changer for me. As someone who values smooth and responsive interactions, the 144Hz display significantly enhances everyday tasks, from web browsing to gaming. The slightly more powerful processor complements this responsiveness, ensuring a fluid user experience. While I acknowledge the M52's advantages in display vibrancy and ergonomics, the X4 GT's focus on performance and speed aligns better with my personal preferences for a mobile device. The responsiveness of the display, combined with the powerful processor, creates a more enjoyable and productive user experience overall, even considering the slightly bulkier design.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.