Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 November 11, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 109.13 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 173 g 195 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 399 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 45.82 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 12

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's dive into a narrative-driven comparison that reveals how design choices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe M52's AMOLED screen delivers vibrant colors and deeper blacks, resulting in a more visually engaging experience. The 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations compared to the Poco M4 Pro's 90Hz.
Interaction FlowOne UI 3.1MIUI 12.5 for POCOBoth offer customizable experiences, but One UI is generally considered cleaner and more intuitive.
AccessibilityFingerprint (side)Fingerprint (side)Both offer convenient biometric unlocking.
Ergonomics7.4mm thin, 173g8.8mm thin, 195gThe M52 is noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed on a sunny day. On the M52's AMOLED display, photos and videos pop with vibrant color, even outdoors. The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling feel incredibly smooth, like silk gliding through your fingers. In contrast, the Poco M4 Pro's LCD screen might appear washed out in direct sunlight, and the 90Hz refresh rate, while still good, won't feel quite as fluid.

Scenario: You're late for a meeting and quickly need to unlock your phone. Both phones offer a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, allowing for quick and intuitive unlocking without awkward hand gymnastics.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their 5G connectivity and mid-range pricing. However, the M52's superior display and more refined design might appeal to users who prioritize visual experience and comfortable handling. The Poco M4 Pro, with its slightly lower price point, might be more attractive to budget-conscious users who prioritize functionality over aesthetics. Users sensitive to heavier phones might find the M52 more comfortable for extended use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer solid features, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G presents a more compelling user experience due to its superior AMOLED display, higher refresh rate, and slimmer, lighter design. These design choices translate into a more engaging and comfortable user experience in everyday scenarios. The Poco M4 Pro offers a good value proposition, but it doesn't quite match the M52's overall polish and refinement.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. While the Poco M4 Pro 5G is a solid contender with a competitive price, the M52's superior display technology and more refined design are decisive factors for me. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED screen significantly enhances daily interactions, making everything from web browsing to video watching more enjoyable. The slimmer profile and lighter weight also contribute to a more comfortable user experience, especially during extended use. As someone who values both aesthetics and functionality, the M52's overall package is more appealing, even with a slightly higher price tag. The feeling of a well-designed product in my hand, coupled with the vibrant visual experience, makes the M52 a clear winner in my book.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.