Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 March 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 95.71 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 173 g 179.5 g
Height 164.2 mm 159.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 52.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs. We'll weave a narrative around their features, considering how design choices impact your daily interactions.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, One UI skin, AMOLED DisplayMIUI, AMOLED DisplaySamsung offers a generally smoother, more refined interface experience with vibrant color reproduction.
Interaction Flow120Hz Refresh Rate, Snapdragon 778G90Hz Refresh Rate, Helio G96M52's higher refresh rate and more powerful processor provide a more fluid and responsive feel.
Accessibility FeaturesOne UI accessibility suiteMIUI accessibility optionsBoth offer robust accessibility features, but Samsung's One UI generally receives higher praise.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm), Lighter (173g)Slightly thicker (8.1mm), Heavier (179.5g)M52 offers a more comfortable in-hand feel for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine scrolling through your social media feed. On the M52 5G, the 120Hz refresh rate makes the experience feel incredibly smooth, like silk flowing through your fingers. The Snapdragon 778G effortlessly handles multitasking, allowing you to seamlessly switch between apps without lag. On the Poco M4 Pro, the 90Hz display is still good, but lacks that extra buttery smoothness. While the Helio G96 is capable, demanding tasks might introduce occasional hiccups.

Scenario: You're capturing a memorable moment. While both phones boast capable cameras, the M52 5G's superior processor allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to a broad audience. However, the M52 5G's smoother performance and refined interface might be more appealing to users who prioritize a fluid, lag-free experience. The Poco M4 Pro, with its competitive price point, offers excellent value for users seeking a balance between performance and affordability. For visually impaired users, both devices offer screen readers and other accessibility features, making them inclusive options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing the Right Device:

  • Prioritize Performance and Smoothness: Opt for the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its superior processor, higher refresh rate display, and refined software experience deliver a premium feel.
  • Value for Money: The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro offers compelling features at a more affordable price. If budget is a primary concern, the Poco M4 Pro provides excellent value without compromising significantly on user experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

As a technology communications specialist focused on user experience, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. While the Poco M4 Pro is a strong contender in terms of value, the M52 5G's superior performance, smoother display, and refined One UI contribute to a significantly more enjoyable and intuitive user experience. The slimmer profile and lighter weight also enhance its ergonomic appeal. In the long run, the investment in the M52 5G would likely translate to a more satisfying and frustration-free mobile experience, making it the better choice for my user-centric approach. The fluid interaction, powered by the Snapdragon 778G and 120Hz display, aligns perfectly with my philosophy of technology seamlessly integrating into our lives, not hindering it with lag or stutter. The subtle design nuances in One UI contribute to an overall sense of calm and control, prioritizing the user's well-being in the digital space. These factors outweigh the price difference for me, emphasizing the importance of investing in a quality user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.