Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 April 28, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 105.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 173 g 210 g
Height 164.2 mm 162.5 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 86.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 105.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 44.36 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's move beyond the numbers and delve into the real-world experience these phones offer. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how their design choices translate into daily use.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GXiaomi Poco F4 GTUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 3.1MIUI 13 for POCOBoth offer customizable interfaces, but MIUI tends to have more bloatware. One UI generally feels cleaner and more intuitive for a broader audience.
Interaction FlowSmooth, responsiveGaming-focusedThe M52 offers a balanced experience, while the Poco F4 GT prioritizes speed and responsiveness, especially for gaming, potentially at the expense of battery life.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth provide basic Android accessibility features, but further customization might be needed for specific user needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlim, lightweightThicker, heavierThe M52's slim profile makes it comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods. The Poco F4 GT's extra weight might be noticeable during prolonged use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who needs a reliable phone for communication, multitasking, and occasional media consumption.

  • M52 5G: Offers a balanced experience. Its long-lasting battery ensures they stay connected throughout the day. The sleek design fits comfortably in their pocket during commutes. The smooth interface allows for seamless switching between work apps and personal entertainment.
  • Poco F4 GT: The powerful processor handles demanding tasks effortlessly, but the shorter battery life might require midday charging. The gaming-centric design might feel overkill for their needs. While performance is exceptional, it might come at the cost of overall usability for a non-gamer.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a Senior User: The M52 5G's lighter weight and simpler interface might be easier to manage.
  • For a Student: The Poco F4 GT's raw power is attractive for gaming and demanding apps, but the M52 5G's balanced approach and longer battery life might be more practical for everyday academic life.
  • For a Creative Professional: Both phones offer decent cameras, but the Poco F4 GT's superior processing power might be advantageous for photo and video editing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52 5G prioritizes everyday usability and comfort, making it suitable for a broader audience. The Poco F4 GT caters to power users and mobile gamers, prioritizing performance over all-day battery life and ease of handling.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, focusing on user-centered design and real-world usability, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its balanced approach, slim design, long battery life, and clean interface provide a more enjoyable and accessible experience for a wider range of users. While the Poco F4 GT boasts impressive power, its gaming-centric focus and bulkier form factor detract from the overall user experience for average everyday use. It's a powerful device, but it sacrifices usability for specialized performance, which doesn't align with my core principles. The M52 5G better embodies the concept of technology seamlessly integrating into daily life without compromises.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.