Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 173 g 181 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 87 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, focusing on how their features translate into real-world user experiences. Instead of getting bogged down in technical jargon, we'll explore how these devices feel in your hand and how their design choices impact your daily interactions.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GSamsung Galaxy A73 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 3.1 based on Android 11One UI 4.1 based on Android 12A73 offers a slightly more refined and potentially feature-rich interface due to the newer Android version.
Interaction FlowStandard Samsung Experience; 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrollingStandard Samsung Experience; 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrollingBoth offer fluid navigation, though software optimizations in the A73 might provide a slight edge.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 accessibility featuresStandard Android 12 accessibility features, potentially enhancedA73 likely offers more comprehensive accessibility options due to the newer OS.
Design ErgonomicsLightweight (173g), slim (7.4mm)Slightly heavier (181g), slightly thicker (7.6mm)M52 might feel more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter and slimmer profile.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be quicker to access.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're browsing your social media feed. Both phones offer a vibrant Super AMOLED Plus display with a buttery smooth 120Hz refresh rate. This means scrolling through endless photos and videos feels incredibly fluid and responsive on both devices. However, the A73 boasts optical image stabilization (OIS) in its main camera, which translates to steadier videos when you're capturing life's moments. Picture this: you're filming your child's soccer game; the A73's OIS will help minimize shaky footage, allowing you to relive those memories with clarity.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their intuitive One UI interface. However, the subtle design differences, like the fingerprint sensor placement, can impact user experience. Someone with smaller hands might find the side-mounted sensor on the M52 more accessible. Conversely, users who prefer a clean, uninterrupted front display might gravitate towards the A73's under-display sensor.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these two largely comes down to personal priorities. If a lightweight, slim design and a potentially lower price point are paramount, the M52 5G is a strong contender. If you prioritize a more modern aesthetic with an under-display fingerprint sensor, slightly improved software experience due to the newer Android version, and OIS for enhanced video recording, the A73 5G might be the better choice. Both phones offer excellent performance and features for everyday use.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. While the M52 5G offers a compelling lightweight design, the A73 5G's OIS for video recording significantly enhances the storytelling aspect of mobile filmmaking. As a technology communicator who values capturing and sharing moments, this feature resonates deeply with my narrative-driven approach. Additionally, the newer Android version on the A73 5G promises a slightly more polished user experience and potentially longer software support, which is crucial for long-term usability. While the slight increase in weight and thickness is a consideration, the overall design of the A73 5G, coupled with the superior camera capabilities, aligns better with my user-centered, design-conscious perspective. It provides a more complete user experience that empowers creativity and connection.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.