Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 173 g 199 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.3 mm
Width 76.4 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A34: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A34, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs. We'll weave a narrative around their features, considering how design choices impact daily interactions.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GSamsung Galaxy A34User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 3.1 based on Android 11One UI 5.1 based on Android 13A34 benefits from a more modern, refined interface with potential performance and feature enhancements.
Interaction FlowSmooth, 120Hz refresh rateSmooth, 120Hz refresh rateBoth offer fluid scrolling and animations, but the newer OS on the A34 may offer smoother transitions overall.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 accessibilityEnhanced Android 13 accessibilityA34 likely provides more robust accessibility features due to OS updates, catering to a wider range of user needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlim and lightweight (7.4mm, 173g)Slightly thicker and heavier (8.2mm, 199g)M52 5G might offer a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter and slimmer profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their phone for communication, multitasking, and entertainment.

  • M52 5G: This user appreciates the snappy performance powered by the Snapdragon 778G, enabling seamless multitasking between work apps and video calls. The large 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus display immerses them in their favorite shows during their commute.
  • A34: This user enjoys the longer software support and enhanced camera features of the A34. The updated One UI 5.1 provides a polished and intuitive experience. The optically stabilized camera allows for capturing clear and steady videos of their child's soccer game, even while cheering from the sidelines. The brighter screen (1000 nits HBM) is great outdoors.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Older Adults: The A34's updated Android OS and One UI likely offer simplified interfaces and enhanced accessibility features, making it potentially more suitable for older adults.
  • Power Users: While both phones offer ample performance, the slightly more powerful CPU and GPU of the M52 5G might appeal to users who demand peak performance for gaming or resource-intensive tasks.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Both phones offer compelling features, but the choice hinges on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Software and Camera: The A34 offers a more updated software experience with longer support and a camera system with optical image stabilization, resulting in better photos and videos.
  • Prioritize Performance and Ergonomics: The M52 5G excels in raw performance and offers a slimmer, lighter design for a more comfortable in-hand feel.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the M52 5G boasts a slightly faster processor, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A34. The deciding factors are the newer Android OS, guaranteeing longer software updates and security patches, and the inclusion of optical image stabilization for the camera. In my user-centered approach, the long-term usability, enhanced software experience, and superior camera functionality outweigh the marginal performance difference. The A34 represents a more future-proof investment with a more polished user experience overall. Finally, the slightly larger battery in the A34 provides more daily use.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.