Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 September 2, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 173 g 197 g
Height 164.2 mm 165.4 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GSamsung Galaxy A23 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz refresh ratePLS LCD, 120Hz refresh rateThe M52's Super AMOLED Plus display delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to the superior display technology. This translates to a more visually engaging and responsive experience.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G processorSnapdragon 695 processorThe M52's more powerful processor will likely result in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more fluid overall experience. While both phones offer 120Hz refresh rates, the M52's superior processing power ensures that the smooth visuals are consistently maintained.
Accessibility FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones offer convenient biometric unlocking. However, further investigation into software features like one-handed mode and text scaling would be needed for a complete accessibility assessment.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (173g) and slimmer (7.4mm)Heavier (197g) and thicker (8.4mm)The M52 offers a more comfortable in-hand feel, especially for extended use. Its lighter weight and slimmer profile make it easier to hold and carry.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a photography enthusiast who loves capturing spontaneous moments. The M52's superior camera hardware, particularly its 64MP main sensor compared to the A23's 50MP, allows you to capture more detail and offers greater flexibility for cropping and editing. The M52 also boasts a dedicated macro lens, missing in the A23, allowing for stunning close-up shots.

Scenario: You're a mobile gamer on the go. The M52's more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor and Adreno 642L GPU will deliver a significantly smoother gaming experience with higher frame rates and reduced lag compared to the A23's Snapdragon 695 and Adreno 619.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their 5G connectivity, large displays, and long-lasting batteries. However, the M52's performance advantage makes it a better choice for users who demand more from their phones, like gamers or content creators. The A23, while less powerful, could be a suitable option for budget-conscious users prioritizing essential features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52 prioritizes performance and a premium visual experience, evident in its AMOLED display and powerful processor. The A23 emphasizes affordability and practicality.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the A23 5G is a solid contender, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. It offers a significantly better user experience due to its superior AMOLED display, faster processor, and more versatile camera system. The slimmer, lighter design also enhances daily usability. While the price difference might exist, the M52's advantages in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities create a more enjoyable and engaging mobile experience, justifying the investment for a user who values these features. It aligns more closely with a user who appreciates a fluid, responsive, and visually rich interaction with their technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.