Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 March 25, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 173 g 195 g
Height 164.2 mm 165.4 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A23: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just through specs, but through the lens of user experience. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A23.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GSamsung Galaxy A23User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120HzPLS LCD, 90HzThe M52's vibrant AMOLED display with a smoother 120Hz refresh rate offers a significantly more engaging and responsive visual experience.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G 5GSnapdragon 680 4GThe M52's superior processor ensures faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more fluid overall experience.
Accessibility FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintBoth offer convenient biometric unlocking.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm), Lighter (173g)Thicker (8.4mm), Heavier (195g)The M52's slimmer and lighter profile contributes to a more comfortable one-handed use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed. On the M52's 120Hz AMOLED display, the images and videos flow seamlessly, with vibrant colors popping out. The experience feels incredibly fluid and responsive. On the A23's 90Hz LCD, the experience is noticeably less smooth, with less vibrant colors and a slightly less responsive feel.

Scenario: You're trying to capture a quick photo of a moving object. The M52's faster processor allows for quicker image processing, reducing blur and ensuring you capture the moment. The A23, with its less powerful processor, might experience a slight delay, potentially missing the perfect shot.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For the everyday user: The M52's superior display and performance make everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming more enjoyable.

For the power user: While neither phone is a flagship device, the M52's stronger processor and 5G connectivity make it better suited for demanding tasks and faster downloads.

For the budget-conscious user: The A23 offers a more affordable entry point while still providing a decent overall experience.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52 prioritizes a premium visual and interactive experience, while the A23 focuses on affordability and essential functionality.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the A23 is a respectable contender in its price range, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. The superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, coupled with the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor, creates a noticeably more enjoyable and responsive user experience. The slimmer and lighter design further enhances its appeal. For me, the difference in user experience outweighs the price difference. The M52 offers a more future-proof experience with its 5G capabilities, ensuring faster connectivity and better performance in the long run. It’s an investment in a smoother, more engaging mobile experience that I believe is worth the extra cost.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.