Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 173 g 185 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Smartphones: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Realme C65

Let's embark on a journey into the world of two intriguing smartphones, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Realme C65. Instead of drowning in a sea of specifications, we'll explore their personalities, understanding how their design choices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GRealme C65User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSleek, modern One UI, AMOLED display, 120Hz refresh rateFunctional, basic UI, IPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rateM52 offers a visually richer, smoother experience. C65 provides a standard, less vibrant visual interaction.
Interaction FlowFluid navigation, responsive touch, feature-rich OSSimpler navigation, potentially less responsiveM52 offers a more premium, engaging user experience. C65 prioritizes basic functionality over advanced features.
Accessibility FeaturesExtensive customization options, One UI accessibility suiteStandard Android accessibility featuresM52 likely offers greater flexibility for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlim, lightweight design (7.4mm, 173g)Slightly thicker and heavier (7.6mm, 185g)M52 provides a more comfortable in-hand experience, especially for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their smartphone for everything from video conferencing to social media.

  • M52 5G: With its powerful Snapdragon 778G processor and vibrant AMOLED display, the M52 ensures seamless multitasking and a visually immersive experience. The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through emails and presentations incredibly smooth. Picture them effortlessly switching between apps during a video call, the image crystal clear and responsive.
  • C65: The C65, with its Helio G85 processor and IPS LCD, handles everyday tasks adequately. However, demanding applications might experience occasional lag. Our professional might notice slight delays when switching apps or during video playback. The 90Hz refresh rate offers a degree of smoothness, but not as fluid as the M52's.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: The M52 5G, with its advanced features and 5G connectivity, caters to users who demand high performance and future-proof technology.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The C65 provides essential smartphone functionality at a more affordable price point, making it accessible to a wider range of users.
  • Senior User: While both phones offer large screens for easy viewing, the M52's One UI might be easier to navigate due to its customizable interface. The C65's simpler interface could also be beneficial for those less familiar with technology.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The M52 5G and Realme C65 cater to different user priorities. The M52 emphasizes a premium user experience through its superior display, powerful processor, and refined design. The C65 prioritizes affordability and basic functionality.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the Realme C65 offers a solid value proposition, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G resonates more with my user-centric approach. Its vibrant AMOLED display, smooth 120Hz refresh rate, and powerful processor contribute to a significantly more engaging and enjoyable user experience. The slimmer, lighter design further enhances its appeal for daily use. Though pricier, the M52's long-term value proposition, stemming from its superior performance and features, justifies the investment for a user who values a seamless and enriching mobile experience. It’s a device that not only performs well but also elevates the everyday interactions, transforming mundane tasks into moments of delight.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.