Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Oppo A57 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 June 6, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 98.22 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 173 g 187 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Glowing Black
  • Glowing Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 50.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 642L PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Oppo A57 4G: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the user experience offered by the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Oppo A57 4G. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how these devices translate technical capabilities into real-world usability.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GOppo A57 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz refresh rate, 1080 x 2400 pixelsIPS LCD, 720 x 1612 pixelsThe M52 offers a significantly more vibrant and smooth visual experience due to its superior display technology and higher resolution. The 120Hz refresh rate translates to fluid scrolling and animations, making interactions feel more responsive.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G 5G processorHelio G35 processorThe M52's more powerful processor ensures smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience. The A57, with its less powerful processor, might exhibit occasional lag, especially with demanding tasks.
Accessibility FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensor, One UISide-mounted fingerprint sensor, ColorOSBoth phones offer fingerprint sensors for convenient unlocking. Software experiences (One UI vs. ColorOS) may have subtle differences in accessibility features, requiring further investigation based on individual user needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm) and lighter (173g)Thicker (8mm) and heavier (187g)The M52's slimmer and lighter profile contributes to a more comfortable one-handed usage experience over extended periods.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed. On the M52's 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus display, images pop with vibrant colors, and the smooth scrolling feels incredibly natural. On the A57's IPS LCD, the experience is less visually engaging, and scrolling might not feel as fluid. While both allow you to connect with friends and family, the M52 elevates the experience with its superior display.

Scenario: You're trying to capture a quick photo of a moving object. The M52's superior camera hardware and processing capabilities are likely to result in a clearer, more detailed image. The A57's camera, while functional, might struggle in challenging lighting conditions or with fast-moving subjects.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to a broad audience, but the M52, with its superior performance and display, offers a more premium and enjoyable user experience for those who engage in visually demanding tasks like gaming or media consumption. The A57, with its lower price point, targets users prioritizing affordability over top-tier performance.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G prioritizes a premium user experience through its design choices. Its superior display, faster processor, and slimmer profile contribute to a more engaging and enjoyable interaction. The Oppo A57 4G, while offering a functional smartphone experience, focuses on affordability.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. While the Oppo A57 4G offers good value for its price, the M52's superior display, performance, and overall design philosophy align more closely with my user-centered approach to technology. The fluid 120Hz refresh rate, vibrant Super AMOLED screen, and the powerful processor contribute significantly to a more enjoyable and responsive user experience. The slightly higher price is justified by the noticeable difference in daily usability and long-term satisfaction. The M52 feels like a device designed to enhance user interaction, not just meet basic functionality.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.