Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Nokia G100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 October 1, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 113.73 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 173 g 195.1 g
Height 164.2 mm 166.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Nordic Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 43.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Nokia G100: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. We'll explore how their features translate into real-world experiences for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GNokia G100User Experience Impact
Interface DesignModern, sleek, minimal bezels, AMOLED DisplayTraditional, thicker bezels, IPS LCDM52 offers a more vibrant, immersive visual experience.
Interaction FlowSmooth, responsive due to 120Hz refresh rateStandard refresh rate, can feel less fluidM52's higher refresh rate provides a noticeably smoother, more enjoyable experience.
AccessibilityOne UI, customizable, good color contrastStock Android, simpler interfaceBoth offer decent accessibility, but M52 allows for greater personalization.
ErgonomicsSlim, lightweight despite large screenThicker, heavierM52 is more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine scrolling through your social media feed. On the M52's vibrant Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the experience is like flipping through a glossy magazine – smooth and visually engaging. The Nokia G100, with its standard IPS LCD and refresh rate, provides a more basic, functional experience, like reading a newspaper.

Key takeaway: The M52 transforms everyday tasks into more enjoyable experiences through its superior display and performance.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A young professional: Values speed, aesthetics, and a premium feel. The M52's sleek design, powerful processor, and 5G connectivity align perfectly with their needs.

User 2: A budget-conscious senior: Prioritizes simplicity, long battery life, and ease of use. While both phones offer long battery life, the G100's simpler interface might be more appealing.

Recommendation: The M52 caters to users who prioritize performance and a modern mobile experience. The G100 is a suitable option for those seeking a reliable, budget-friendly device with a focus on essential features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: While the Nokia G100 offers solid fundamentals, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G excels in delivering a holistic, refined user experience. It's about more than just having a good camera or long battery life – it's about how all the elements work together to create a seamless and enjoyable interaction.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the Nokia G100 offers great value for its price, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its superior display, smoother performance thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate, sleek design, and faster processor create a significantly more enjoyable and engaging mobile experience. The difference in price is justified by the noticeable leap in overall quality and the long-term satisfaction it provides. It aligns with my philosophy of prioritizing user experience and appreciating well-executed design. The M52 feels like a device designed for how we actually use our phones, not just a collection of specifications.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.