Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 173 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore these two phones as complete user experiences, focusing on how their design choices impact your daily interactions.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraUser Experience Impact
Form FactorStandard Slab DesignFoldable Clamshell DesignRazr's compact folded size offers portability; unfolded, it provides a large screen. M52 offers a familiar, single-screen experience.
Interface DesignOne UI (Android 11)My UX (Android 14)Razr benefits from newer Android features and potential UI enhancements. M52 offers a well-established, though older, Android experience.
Interaction FlowTraditional touch-based navigationFoldable screen enables unique interactionsRazr allows for flexible use cases like hands-free video calls and compact viewing. M52 relies on standard touchscreen interactions.
AccessibilityStandard Android Accessibility FeaturesPotentially Enhanced with Android 14Razr may offer newer accessibility features introduced in later Android versions, benefiting users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlim and lightweightCompact when folded, potentially bulky openM52 provides a comfortable single-hand experience. Razr's folded form excels in portability, but unfolded ergonomics depend on hinge design.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: On-the-Go Content Consumption: Imagine commuting on a crowded train. The M52's large 6.7" screen provides ample space for enjoying videos, but its size might be cumbersome in tight spaces. The Razr, when folded, easily slips into a pocket. Opened up, it reveals a similar large screen for immersive viewing, showcasing its versatile design.

Scenario: Capturing Memories: Both phones boast impressive camera systems. The M52's triple-lens setup focuses on versatility, while the Razr emphasizes high-resolution imaging with a dual camera system. The Razr's foldable design allows for creative angles and hands-free selfies, adding a unique dimension to photography.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: Tech-Savvy Professional: The Razr's cutting-edge technology and foldable design might appeal to a user who values innovation and unique features. They may appreciate the multitasking capabilities offered by the folding screen. The M52 offers a reliable, familiar experience for those prioritizing performance and affordability.

User 2: Senior Citizen: The M52's larger, clearer icons and simpler interface might be more accessible for a senior user. The Razr's folding mechanism, while innovative, could introduce complexity. Font size customization and ease of navigation become crucial factors for this user group.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond raw specifications, consider these design-driven questions:

  • Lifestyle: Do you prioritize portability and compactness or a single, large screen experience?
  • Interaction Preferences: Do you value innovative interaction methods enabled by a foldable design, or are you comfortable with traditional touchscreen navigation?
  • Budget: The Razr, with its cutting-edge technology, typically comes at a higher price point than the M52.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra represents a fascinating leap in mobile technology with its foldable design, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. My decision rests on prioritizing a seamless, reliable user experience over novelty. The M52's larger battery capacity (5000mAh vs. 4000mAh) ensures longer usage without frequent recharging, crucial for my on-the-go lifestyle. Its slim, lightweight design offers superior ergonomics for extended use. While the Razr's folding screen is intriguing, I find the M52's traditional slab design more practical and less prone to potential durability issues associated with foldable displays. Finally, the M52's more affordable price point aligns better with my budget preferences while still offering robust performance and a satisfying user experience. Ultimately, the M52 offers a dependable, well-rounded experience that caters to my everyday needs without unnecessary complexity.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.