Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Motorola Moto G53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 December 15, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 99.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 173 g 183 g
Height 164.2 mm 162.7 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 50.17 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Motorola Moto G53: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's delve into the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and Motorola Moto G53, focusing on what truly matters: your experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GMotorola Moto G53User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz refresh rate, 1080 x 2400 pixelsIPS LCD, 120Hz refresh rate, 720 x 1600 pixelsThe M52 offers a significantly sharper and more vibrant display due to its higher resolution and AMOLED technology. This translates to a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and sharper text for reading.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G 5G processorSnapdragon 480+ 5G processorThe M52's more powerful processor ensures smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience. While the G53's processor is capable, it might show lag with demanding tasks or heavy multitasking.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility features, One UIStandard Android accessibility features, My UXBoth phones offer standard Android accessibility features. Specific customization options within One UI and My UX may slightly alter the accessibility experience but generally remain comparable.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.4mm) and lighter (173g)Thicker (8.2mm) and heavier (183g)The M52's slimmer and lighter profile contributes to a more comfortable one-handed use and easier portability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're browsing your favorite social media platform on a sunny afternoon. On the M52's vibrant Super AMOLED display, colors pop, and the smooth 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling feel incredibly fluid. The experience is akin to flipping through a glossy magazine. In contrast, the G53's IPS LCD, while still offering a 120Hz refresh rate, lacks the same visual punch and might appear washed out in direct sunlight.

Scenario: You're trying to capture a quick video of your pet doing something funny. The M52's superior camera system, with a 64MP main sensor, allows you to capture detailed videos in 4K resolution. You can zoom in later without losing much clarity. The G53's 50MP camera and 1080p video recording capability are decent, but won't offer the same level of detail or flexibility.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For the average user: The M52 offers a more premium and enjoyable experience thanks to its better display, performance, and camera.

For budget-conscious users: The G53 provides a decent 5G experience at a lower price point, but compromises on certain aspects like display quality and processing power.

For users prioritizing battery life: Both phones offer a large 5000mAh battery, but the M52's more efficient processor might translate to slightly longer battery life in real-world usage.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these phones depends on your priorities. If you value a vibrant display, smooth performance, and a capable camera, the M52 is the clear winner. However, if your budget is tight and 5G connectivity is your primary concern, the G53 offers a reasonable alternative.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the Moto G53 offers a compelling price, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its superior Super AMOLED display, coupled with the more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor, promises a significantly more enjoyable and responsive user experience. The slimmer design and superior camera system further solidify its position as the better overall device. For me, the difference in user experience outweighs the price difference. The investment in a smoother, more visually engaging device enhances daily interactions with technology, making it a more worthwhile choice in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.