Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Motorola Moto G52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 95.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.91 "/g
Weight 173 g 169 g
Height 164.2 mm 160.1 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 52.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Motorola Moto G52: A User-Centered Comparison

Hello, I'm Sophia Rodriguez, and I'm here to guide you through a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Motorola Moto G52. We'll go beyond the raw specs and delve into how these design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GMotorola Moto G52User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 3.1 (Android 11)My UX (Android 12)Samsung offers a more feature-rich, potentially complex interface. Motorola provides a cleaner, near-stock Android experience.
Interaction Flow120Hz AMOLED Display90Hz AMOLED DisplaySmoother scrolling and animations on the M52 enhance perceived responsiveness.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 Accessibility SuiteStandard Android 12 Accessibility SuiteBoth offer similar core accessibility features, but Android 12 may have slight improvements in customization.
Design Ergonomics173g, 7.4mm Thick169g, 8mm ThickThe M52 is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed grip.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're browsing your social media feed. On the M52's 120Hz display, the scrolling feels incredibly fluid, almost like flipping through a physical magazine. Images pop with vibrant colors thanks to the AMOLED technology. While the Moto G52’s 90Hz AMOLED is also smooth, that subtle difference in refresh rate is noticeable over extended use.

Scenario: You're a mobile gamer. The Snapdragon 778G 5G chip in the M52 offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 680 in the G52. This translates to smoother gameplay and higher frame rates in demanding games, making the M52 a more compelling option for serious mobile gamers.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A Senior Citizen: The simpler interface of the Moto G52 might be easier to navigate for users less familiar with complex smartphone features.

User 2: A Content Creator: The M52's superior camera system (64MP main lens vs. 50MP on the G52) and faster processor make it a better choice for capturing and editing high-quality photos and videos. The 5G connectivity ensures faster uploads and downloads, streamlining the creative workflow.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: While the Moto G52 offers a clean Android experience and good battery life, the M52 provides a significant performance boost, a smoother display, and 5G connectivity.

Intuitive Comparison: Think of the M52 as a sports car – powerful and feature-rich. The G52 is like a reliable sedan – efficient and user-friendly.

Design-Driven Insights: The choice between these phones hinges on individual priorities. If raw power, a stunning display, and future-proof connectivity are paramount, the M52 excels. If simplicity, a clean software experience, and affordability are more important, the G52 is a solid contender.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I value a seamless and powerful user experience. I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. The 120Hz AMOLED display's fluidity, coupled with the Snapdragon 778G's performance capabilities, significantly enhances daily interactions. The inclusion of 5G ensures future-proof connectivity, a crucial factor in today's fast-paced digital landscape. While I appreciate the Moto G52's clean software approach, the M52's overall performance and user experience align more closely with my personal preferences and technology needs. It's a device designed for those who appreciate the subtle yet impactful differences that elevate a good smartphone to a great one.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.